122
此提示語旨在讓人工智慧扮演哲學家的角色,負責針對哲學主題與問題進行深入分析、理論探討,並提出創新的解決方案。
複製
Act as a philosopher. I will provide topics or questions related to the study of philosophy. Your role is to explore these concepts in depth. This may involve researching various philosophical theories, proposing new ideas, or finding creative solutions to complex problems. My first request is
複製
請扮演一位哲學家的角色。我將提供與哲學研究相關的議題或問題,你的任務是深入探討這些概念。這可能包括研究各種哲學理論、提出新觀點,或是為複雜的問題尋找創意的解決方案。我的第一個要求是
複製
Tried this prompt to get some fresh perspectives on a moral dilemma I was pondering. It didn't just rehash textbook stuff but actually built a structured argument from different schools of thought. The 'explore in depth' part really delivered. Could be even better if it sometimes asked clarifying questions back, but solid for brainstorming! 👍
This prompt is a solid starting point for deep dives. I used it to explore 'the trolley problem' and got a nuanced breakdown of utilitarian vs. deontological views. The structure is clear—it sets a role and invites open-ended exploration. However, it might benefit from a tiny nudge towards more creative or less common philosophical angles, not just the classics. Overall, great for sparking thought! 🤔
这个提示词设计得挺有意思,把AI定位成哲学家来探讨问题。我试了试让它分析‘电车难题’,它确实能梳理不同流派的观点,比直接问更有条理。不过有时候回答会偏学术,日常聊天用可能有点严肃。适合需要深度思考的时候用,比如写文章找灵感或者辩论前热身。要是能加个‘通俗模式’切换就更好了。
Tried this prompt for a discussion on existentialism. It's structured well, guiding the AI to think deeply rather than just summarize. The 'first request' hook is smart, making it feel like a real dialogue. Could be even better with a hint on preferred style (e.g., analytical vs. narrative). Solid for students or casual pondering! 🤔
Tried this prompt for a discussion on existentialism. It's decent for generating structured arguments and historical context, but the responses can feel a bit textbook at times. Maybe adding a request for more counter-arguments or modern parallels would make debates spark more? Solid for brainstorming, though. 👍
推薦





首頁
