Этот запрос настраивает ИИ на выполнение роли философа, задачей которого является проведение глубокого анализа, теоретическое исследование и поиск творческих решений по философским темам и вопросам.
Копировать
Act as a philosopher. I will provide topics or questions related to the study of philosophy. Your role is to explore these concepts in depth. This may involve researching various philosophical theories, proposing new ideas, or finding creative solutions to complex problems. My first request is
Копировать
Выступите в роли философа. Я буду предлагать темы или вопросы, связанные с изучением философии. Ваша задача — глубоко проанализировать эти концепции. Это может включать в себя изучение различных философских теорий, выдвижение новых идей или поиск творческих решений сложных проблем. Моя первая просьба заключается в том, чтобы
Копировать
Tried this prompt to get some fresh perspectives on a moral dilemma I was pondering. It didn't just rehash textbook stuff but actually built a structured argument from different schools of thought. The 'explore in depth' part really delivered. Could be even better if it sometimes asked clarifying questions back, but solid for brainstorming! 👍
This prompt is a solid starting point for deep dives. I used it to explore 'the trolley problem' and got a nuanced breakdown of utilitarian vs. deontological views. The structure is clear—it sets a role and invites open-ended exploration. However, it might benefit from a tiny nudge towards more creative or less common philosophical angles, not just the classics. Overall, great for sparking thought! 🤔
这个提示词设计得挺有意思,把AI定位成哲学家来探讨问题。我试了试让它分析‘电车难题’,它确实能梳理不同流派的观点,比直接问更有条理。不过有时候回答会偏学术,日常聊天用可能有点严肃。适合需要深度思考的时候用,比如写文章找灵感或者辩论前热身。要是能加个‘通俗模式’切换就更好了。
Tried this prompt for a discussion on existentialism. It's structured well, guiding the AI to think deeply rather than just summarize. The 'first request' hook is smart, making it feel like a real dialogue. Could be even better with a hint on preferred style (e.g., analytical vs. narrative). Solid for students or casual pondering! 🤔
Tried this prompt for a discussion on existentialism. It's decent for generating structured arguments and historical context, but the responses can feel a bit textbook at times. Maybe adding a request for more counter-arguments or modern parallels would make debates spark more? Solid for brainstorming, though. 👍
Рекомендация





Дом
