Step-2-16K VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 5.2 |
| Qwen3-32B (Thinking) | Alibaba | April 29, 2025 | 32B | 7.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16K VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) may not be top-tier but is practically useful, whereas Step-2-16K fails to effectively complete most command-based or multi-step tasks.
Language Understanding Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) delivers average language output; Step-2-16K frequently fails at even basic communication tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. Step-2-16K frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
