Step-2-16K VS ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 6.5 |
| ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K | Baidu | April 25, 2025 | N/A | 7.2 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16K VS ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K is capable of handling most routine tasks, while Step-2-16K lacks accuracy in information processing and consistency in execution.
Language Understanding Comparison
ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K shows strong capabilities; Step-2-16K often outputs faulty language, unsuitable for high-quality interaction.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Step-2-16K has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
