Llama4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct VS Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | Meta | April 5, 2025 | 109B | 5.2 |
| Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking) | Alibaba | April 29, 2025 | 235B | 7.3 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Llama4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct VS Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking) may not be top-tier but is practically useful, whereas Llama4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct fails to effectively complete most command-based or multi-step tasks.
Language Understanding Comparison
Qwen3-235B-A22B (Thinking) shows strong capabilities; Llama4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct often outputs faulty language, unsuitable for high-quality interaction.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
