GLM-4 VS DeepSeek-R1
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-4 | Zhipu AI | January 16, 2024 | N/A | 5.6 |
| DeepSeek-R1 | DeepSeek | January 20, 2025 | 671B | 7.3 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of GLM-4 VS DeepSeek-R1 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
DeepSeek-R1 may not be top-tier but is practically useful, whereas GLM-4 fails to effectively complete most command-based or multi-step tasks.
Language Understanding Comparison
DeepSeek-R1 delivers average language output; GLM-4 frequently fails at even basic communication tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
DeepSeek-R1 has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. GLM-4 frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
