GLM-4 VS Bailing-Lite-1116
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-4 | Zhipu AI | January 16, 2024 | N/A | 5.6 |
| Bailing-Lite-1116 | Ant Group | November 16, 2024 | N/A | 4.7 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of GLM-4 VS Bailing-Lite-1116 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Bailing-Lite-1116 handles basic tasks; GLM-4 often fails to communicate effectively.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
