360Zhinao2-O1.5 VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 360Zhinao2-O1.5 | 360 Zhinao | May 13, 2025 | N/A | 6.6 |
| Qwen3-32B (Thinking) | Alibaba | April 29, 2025 | 32B | 7.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of 360Zhinao2-O1.5 VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) is capable of handling most routine tasks, while 360Zhinao2-O1.5 lacks accuracy in information processing and consistency in execution.
Language Understanding Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) is more consistent; 360Zhinao2-O1.5 has weaknesses in logic and semantics.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. 360Zhinao2-O1.5 frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
