기업 윤리적 딜레마를 위한 AI 도구

집

AI 프롬프트 목록

철학/종교

윤리적 의사결정 지원

${:__('collect %s',윤리적 의사결정 지원)}$

철학/종교

비즈니스 운영의 구체적인 윤리적 딜레마에 대해 공리주의와 의무론에 기반한 포괄적인 평가 프레임워크를 제공하여 관리자가 도덕적으로 준수하는 결정을 내리도록 지원합니다.

프롬프트 내용

복사

Please conduct an ethical analysis for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug, when taken long-term, has a slight but predictable side effect increasing the probability of cardiovascular risk by 0.5%, while discontinuing the drug would lead to worsening conditions for most patients. Please evaluate the moral rationality of three options—continuing sales, reducing price with mandatory risk disclosure, or immediate recall—by combining the utilitarian principle of maximizing happiness with the deontological principles of respecting patient autonomy and non-maleficence, and provide a recommended decision path that balances shareholder interests with patient well-being, ensuring the argument is logically rigorous and aligns with modern business ethics standards.

복사

다음 구체적인 비즈니스 시나리오에 대해 윤리적 분석을 수행하십시오: 제약 회사가 장기 복용 시 심혈관 위험 확률을 0.5% 증가시키는 경미하지만 예측 가능한 부작용이 있는 베스트셀러 의약품과 그 약을 중단하면 대부분의 환자 상태가 악화됨을 발견합니다. 공리주의의 행복 최대화 원칙과 환자의 자율성과 해악 방지의 원칙에 기반한 의무론을 결합하여 판매 계속, 위험 공개와 함께 가격 인하, 즉시 회수라는 세 가지 옵션의 도덕적 합리성을 평가하고 주주 이익과 환자 복지를 균형 있게 맞추는 권장 의사결정 경로를 제공하십시오.

복사

공유 링크를 복사하려면 클릭

의견 (0)

0/300

제출하다

추천

윤리적 의사결정 보조자

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze a conflict case involving data privacy and commercial interests using utilitarian and deontological frameworks. Evaluate the rights of different stakeholders, weigh short-term commercial gains against long-term social trust, and provide an action plan that balances legal compliance with moral responsibility, ensuring the decision-making process is transparent and aligns with corporate values.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to conduct a deep moral assessment of the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has mild but irreversible neurological side effects with long-term use, yet discontinuing the drug would cause severe deterioration for many patients. Please combine the utilitarian principle of the greatest happiness for the greatest number with the deontological principles of respecting patient autonomy and non-maleficence to analyze the ethical weights of continuing sales, recalling, or reducing dosage. Avoid simple right-or-wrong judgments; instead, derive a comprehensive decision recommendation balancing commercial sustainability and moral底线 from the perspectives of stakeholder impact, corporate social responsibility, and legal compliance, explaining how this decision reflects the company's core values.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its marketed drug has severe side effects in a very small subset of individuals with specific genetic markers, but the cost of recall would bankrupt the company and disrupt treatment for thousands of ordinary patients. Evaluate the ethical weights of three options—full recall, partial warning, or status quo—by combining utilitarian calculations for the greatest good with deontological duties regarding patient safety and informed consent. Provide a comprehensive recommendation that balances business survival with moral integrity, focusing on how to establish a priority sequence of values amidst conflicting interests.

윤리적 의사결정 보조 도구

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze a conflict scenario involving data privacy and commercial interests. Apply utilitarian calculations to assess overall well-being and contrast this with deontological principles to examine the inherent righteousness of the action. Finally, output a decision plan that balances stakeholder interests, complies with laws and regulations, and reflects corporate social responsibility. Focus on explaining how to maintain business sustainability while protecting user privacy, avoiding simple binary oppositions, and providing actionable ethical guidelines.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has minor but under-disclosed side effects with long-term use. Recalling it causes massive financial loss and affects shareholder interests, while not recalling it may harm some patients' health. Please evaluate the ethical weights of both choices by combining the impact on overall well-being from a utilitarian perspective with the responsibility for honesty and patient safety from a deontological perspective, and provide a comprehensive recommendation that balances business sustainability with moral底线, focusing on how to rebuild public trust through transparent communication.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its marketed drug has minor but irreversible neurological side effects with long-term use, yet discontinuing it poses higher risks with no alternative therapies. Please evaluate whether the company should proactively recall and disclose this risk, integrating the utilitarian principle of maximizing happiness with the deontological principle of respecting autonomy. In your response, avoid stacking verbs like 'analyze', 'generate', or 'explain'; instead, provide a narrative that balances shareholder interests, patient safety, and public trust, offering an action plan that aligns with legal compliance and moral responsibility, while clearly articulating the ethical reasoning behind this recommendation.