大学教員向け文献レビュー生成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

論文文献レビュー支援

${:__('collect %s',論文文献レビュー支援)}$

学者/教師

特定の研究分野における主要な文献と視点を迅速に整理するための大学教員向け専門ツール。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Act as my academic research assistant. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide, help me organize a structured literature review outline. You need to identify key academic contributions from the last five years, summarize the divergent viewpoints of major schools of thought, and point out current research gaps or controversies. Ensure the cited literature is representative and reliable, maintaining an objective and rigorous academic tone suitable for the introduction section of a paper.

コピー

私の学術研究アシスタントとして行動してください。私が提供する特定の研究トピックとキーワードに基づいて、構造化された文献レビューのアウラインを作成するのを手伝ってください。過去5年間の主要な学術的貢献を特定し、主要な学派の見解の相違を要約し、現在の研究の空白点や論争点を指摘する必要があります。引用される文献が代表的かつ信頼性があることを確認し、論文の導入部に適した客観的で厳格な学術的なトーンを維持してください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (1)

0/300

送信

DonaldGonzález

2026年9月20日 5:26:35 JST

Lit Review Assistant、使ってみたら構造化が凄く楽！5年以内の論文に絞ってギャップも指摘してくれるから、論文の導入部書く時の助けになる。ただ、引用文献の信頼性は自分で確認する必要ありかも。全体的には使い勝手が良くて、学生や研究者にオススメのpromptだと思います。📚✨

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.