難易度別カスタマイズ可能な大学線形代数課題の作成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

大学線形代数授業課題ジェネレーター

${:__('collect %s',大学線形代数授業課題ジェネレーター)}$

学者/教師

指定された難易度、範囲、問題数に基づき、解答解説付きの大学線形代数の課題を作成します。国立大学の教育ニーズに適合しています。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Follow the teaching syllabus of public linear algebra courses for science and engineering majors in Chinese ordinary undergraduate colleges, generate after-class assignments including multiple-choice questions, fill-in-the-blank questions and calculation questions according to the specified difficulty level, knowledge point range and total question requirement, attach clear reference answers and necessary problem-solving ideas for each question, keep the difficulty matching the teaching requirements of undergraduate public courses without exceeding the syllabus or lowering training standards.

コピー

中国の通常の国立大学の理工系専攻の公的線形代数授業のシラバスに従い、指定された難易度、知識範囲、問題数の要件に応じて、選択問題、穴埋め問題、計算問題を含む授業外課題を作成し、各問題に明確な参照解答と必要な問題解決の考え方を添付し、難易度は学部の公的授業の教育要件に合わせ、シラバスを超えたり養成基準を下げたりしないでください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.