教材知識点に適合した大学工学力学の段階別宿題作成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

大学工学力学宿題ジェネレーター

${:__('collect %s',大学工学力学宿題ジェネレーター)}$

学者/教師

指定された大学工学力学の教材章に対し、基礎定着・能力向上・発展探究の3難易度レベルの課後宿題を作成し、異なる学習レベルの学生に適合し、標準解答と採点基準を付属します。

プロンプト内容

コピー

For the taught static equilibrium chapter of college engineering mechanics, refer to the knowledge distribution of Liu Hongwen’s textbook, create a set of after-class homework that includes five basic questions to consolidate core concepts, three medium-difficulty questions to train comprehensive application, and one extended question combined with actual engineering scenarios, all questions come with clear standard answers and simplified scoring points, suitable for mechanical majors in ordinary undergraduate colleges.

コピー

大学工学力学課程で既に講義した静力学平衡の章に対し、劉鴻文版教材の知識点分布を参考に、課後宿題セットを作成してください。核心概念を定着させる基礎問題5問、総合応用力を鍛える中難度問題3問、実際の工事現場に結びつけた発展問題1問を含み、すべての問題に明確な標準解答と簡略化された採点要点を付け、一般本科大学の機械類専攻の学生に適した内容にしてください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (1)

0/300

送信

JeffreyMartinez

2026年10月8日 13:26:40 JST

This prompt is super useful for engineering students! It’s well-structured with clear difficulty levels and real-world scenarios. I love that it includes scoring points—makes grading easier. Only wish it specified the textbook edition more precisely, but overall, a solid tool for homework generation. 📚✨

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify core controversies in the field, major theoretical schools, and recent empirical findings, and sort out the evolutionary trajectory from classical theories to frontier research. Finally, generate a structured literature review outline containing main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research gaps, ensuring logical coherence and standardized citations to support the user's thesis writing needs.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as an academic researcher specializing in higher education. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, draft a rigorous literature review. Identify major theoretical schools, compare methodological differences among scholars, and highlight gaps or controversies in current research. Ensure the language is objective, formal, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding colloquialisms. Logically connect these viewpoints to form a critical review text that assists faculty in course syllabus design or research planning.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.