家
大学経済学課題の採点
学者/教師
28
28
大学基礎ミクロ経済学の宿題を一斉に採点し、誤った知识点をマークし、得点と改善提案を出し、大学経済学部教員の負担を軽減します
プロンプト内容
コピー
コピー
Go through each question of student introductory microeconomics homework, compare with standard chapter knowledge and reference answers, mark wrong knowledge points and incorrect logic, give question scores and a total assignment score, then write brief targeted improvement tips based on the student's overall performance
コピー
大学ミクロ経済学基礎課程の学生の宿題について、該当章の標準的な知识点と模範解答に照らし合わせて問題ごとに採点を行い、誤った知识点と誤った論理をマークし、各問題の得点と宿題の総得点を出し、最後に学生の全体的な習得状況に基づいて簡潔で的確な改善提案を示します
コピー
コメント (0)
0/300
おすすめ
論文校正アシスタント
Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on optimizing the academic tone, vocabulary precision, and logical coherence, while correcting grammatical errors and punctuation usage without altering the original meaning. Ensure the language adheres to the formal style of the target journal, improving readability and eliminating ambiguity, and finally output the revised complete paragraph.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize key literature from the last five years, extract main academic viewpoints, methodological differences, and research gaps, construct a logical review outline, and list 5-8 representative references for further reading.
論文文法修正アシスタント
Act as an experienced academic journal editor. Carefully review the following English academic paragraph, identify and correct all grammar, punctuation, tense consistency, and inappropriate academic vocabulary errors while preserving the original meaning. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with a brief explanation of the main changes made.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, draft a structured literature review. Select representative studies from recent core journals, synthesize main academic viewpoints, identify research gaps, and note methodological limitations. Finally, propose three innovative future research directions based on this analysis, ensuring academic tone and logical coherence.
学術文献レビュー支援
Act as an academic researcher. For a given research topic, retrieve and integrate core academic literature from the past five years, identify key theoretical frameworks and research gaps, and write a clear, logically rigorous literature review summary. Focus on main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research directions, ensuring standardized citations and academic language.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher specializing in educational psychology. Systematically review core literature from the past five years regarding 'factors influencing student engagement in online learning environments.' Synthesize findings from both quantitative and qualitative studies, identify prevailing theoretical frameworks, methodological discrepancies, and existing knowledge gaps. Present the review in a coherent academic paragraph format, ensuring logical rigor and proper citation standards. Finally, output a structured and clear literature review draft for the teacher to refine and finalize.
