집
대학 경제학 과제 채점
학자/교사
28
28
대학 기초 미시경제학 숙제를 일괄 채점하고 틀린 개념을 표시하며 점수와 개선 제안을 제공해 대학 경제학과 교사 부담을 줄입니다
프롬프트 내용
복사
복사
Go through each question of student introductory microeconomics homework, compare with standard chapter knowledge and reference answers, mark wrong knowledge points and incorrect logic, give question scores and a total assignment score, then write brief targeted improvement tips based on the student's overall performance
복사
대학 미시경제학 기초 과목 학생의 과후 숙제를 해당 장의 표준 개념과 참고 답안에 맞춰 문항별로 채점하고, 틀린 개념과 잘못된 논리를 표시하며 각 문항 점수와 숙제 총점을 부여한 뒤, 학생의 전반적인 이해 수준에 맞춰 간결하고 구체적인 개선 제안을 작성합니다
복사
의견 (0)
0/300
추천
논문 교정 도우미
Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on optimizing the academic tone, vocabulary precision, and logical coherence, while correcting grammatical errors and punctuation usage without altering the original meaning. Ensure the language adheres to the formal style of the target journal, improving readability and eliminating ambiguity, and finally output the revised complete paragraph.
문헌 검토 보조 도구
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize key literature from the last five years, extract main academic viewpoints, methodological differences, and research gaps, construct a logical review outline, and list 5-8 representative references for further reading.
논문 문법 수정 도우미
Act as an experienced academic journal editor. Carefully review the following English academic paragraph, identify and correct all grammar, punctuation, tense consistency, and inappropriate academic vocabulary errors while preserving the original meaning. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with a brief explanation of the main changes made.
문헌 검토 어시스턴트
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, draft a structured literature review. Select representative studies from recent core journals, synthesize main academic viewpoints, identify research gaps, and note methodological limitations. Finally, propose three innovative future research directions based on this analysis, ensuring academic tone and logical coherence.
학술 문헌 리뷰
Act as an academic researcher. For a given research topic, retrieve and integrate core academic literature from the past five years, identify key theoretical frameworks and research gaps, and write a clear, logically rigorous literature review summary. Focus on main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research directions, ensuring standardized citations and academic language.
문헌 검토 보조 도구
Act as a senior academic researcher specializing in educational psychology. Systematically review core literature from the past five years regarding 'factors influencing student engagement in online learning environments.' Synthesize findings from both quantitative and qualitative studies, identify prevailing theoretical frameworks, methodological discrepancies, and existing knowledge gaps. Present the review in a coherent academic paragraph format, ensuring logical rigor and proper citation standards. Finally, output a structured and clear literature review draft for the teacher to refine and finalize.
