高校生物遺伝学の知識に合わせた段階別宿題作成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

高校生物遺伝学の宿題作成

${:__('collect %s',高校生物遺伝学の宿題作成)}$

学者/教師

中国版高校生物必修2の遺伝学コア知識に対応し、異なる学力レベルの生徒向け段階別宿題を作成し、解答と出題意図を付属します。

プロンプト内容

コピー

For the core knowledge of gene segregation law in PEP compulsory biology 2 for senior high school, and following the academic requirements of the curriculum standard, design a set of layered after-class homework for grade 11 students, including different question types at three levels: basic consolidation, ability improvement and expansion exploration, mark the corresponding examined knowledge points for each question, sort out complete reference answers, and supplement the proposition intention of each question to ensure the question difficulty meets the learning needs of students at corresponding levels.

コピー

中国人民教育出版社版高校生物必修2にある遺伝子分離の法則のコア知識を対象に、課程標準の学習要求に準拠し、高校2年生向けの段階別宿題を作成します。基礎定着、能力向上、発展探究の3段階の異なる問題形式を含み、各問題ごとに対応する出題範囲の知識点を标注し、完全な模範解答を整理した上で各問題の出題意図を補記し、問題の難易度が対応レベルの生徒の学習ニーズに合うようにしてください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (2)

0/300

送信

JoeGarcía

2026年9月20日 10:26:39 JST

这作业设计挺细致的，分层清晰，还有命题意图，对老师省不少事。就是生物2的孟德尔定律要是能加个实际案例解析就更完美了，学生容易懂。整体评价：实用！🧬

RoyTaylor

2026年9月19日 9:26:34 JST

这个分层作业设计挺实用的，基础到拓展的题目划分很清晰，还附带了命题意图和参考答案，对高中生复习孟德尔遗传定律很有帮助，就是工作量稍微大了点，不过确实能兼顾不同水平的学生。

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to synthesize key literature for a specific research topic and keywords provided by the user. Identify main theoretical frameworks, controversies, and recent trends from the last five years. Write a coherent literature review in natural language that compares core viewpoints, evaluates methodologies, discusses limitations, and suggests future research directions, ensuring logical rigor and academic standards.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, synthesize key academic literature from the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, summarize core controversies, and point out current research gaps. Finally, construct a logically rigorous review framework based on this analysis, suggesting three to five innovative future research directions, ensuring content meets academic standards and citation formats are correct.