学部大学物理実験科目の期末成績評価基準設計

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

大学物理実験の成績評価基準作成

${:__('collect %s',大学物理実験の成績評価基準作成)}$

学者/教師

一般総合大学の大学物理共通実験科目向けに、プロセス評価と最終評価を組み合わせ、公平で実用的な期末総合成績の評価細則を設計する

プロンプト内容

コピー

Design a directly implementable final grading rubric for general undergraduate public physics experiment courses based on actual Chinese university teaching practice, covering attendance, pre-lab reports, in-lab operation, data processing in post-lab reports and final practical exam, clarify score proportion and deduction rules for each part, balance assessment of students' practical ability and scientific literacy, fit large-class teaching scenario of public basic courses to ensure fair and operable grading.

コピー

中国の一般的な総合大学における大学物理共通実験科目の教学実態に基づき、すぐに活用できる期末総合成績の評価細則を設計してください。平常出欠、予習レポート、実験操作、実験レポートのデータ処理、期末操作試験の各項目を網羅し、各項目の得点配分と減点規則を明確にし、学生の実践能力と科学的素養の評価を両立させ、共通基礎科目の大人数授業シーンに適合し、評価が公平かつ操作しやすいようにしてください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

論文校正アシスタント

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.