学部生向けカリキュラム準拠微積分期末試験の作成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

学部生向け微積分期末試験問題作成

${:__('collect %s',学部生向け微積分期末試験問題作成)}$

学者/教師

大学の公共数学教師が、教育要綱に準拠し難易度分布が適切な学部微積分の期末筆記試験問題を作成し、解答と採点基準を提供するのを支援します。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Create a complete 100-point, 120-minute closed-book calculus final exam for undergraduate general education courses that covers core topics of single-variable differential and integral calculus, as well as multi-variable differential and integral calculus, follows a difficulty distribution of 50% easy, 35% medium, 15% hard, includes four question types: multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, calculation and proof, and add reference answers and corresponding grading points for each question.

コピー

我が国の一般的な大学学部共通科目である微積分期末閉鎖型試験の出題要件に従い、満点100点・試験時間120分の標準設定に基づき、一変数微積分・一変数積分学・多変数微積分・多変数積分学のコア知識点を網羅し、難易度比率が易問50%・中問35%・難問15%となる完全な試験問題を作成し、各問題ごとに参照解答と対応する採点要点を付属させ、問題形式は選択問題・穴埋め問題・計算問題・証明問題の4種類を含めてください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject topic and key reference list I provide, write a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze the main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and current academic controversies in existing studies, and point out potential directions for future research. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and standardized citations. Avoid subjective assumptions and only synthesize objectively based on the provided literature. Conclude with a summary statement highlighting recent progress and gaps in the field.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

論文校正アシスタント

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.