企業の倫理的ジレンマAIアドバイザー

家

AIプロンプト一覧

哲学/宗教

倫理的意思決定支援

${:__('collect %s',倫理的意思決定支援)}$

哲学/宗教

功利主義と義務論に基づくバランスの取れた分析を提供し、管理者が価値観に合致した意思決定を行うのを支援します。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to provide decision-making advice for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has mild but non-fatal side effects with long-term use, yet a recall would bankrupt the company and affect the livelihoods of thousands of employees. Please analyze the moral weight of both recall and non-recall paths by combining utilitarian calculations for the greatest good with deontological respect for patient知情权 and human dignity, and propose a specific execution strategy that balances social responsibility with corporate survival, focusing on how to establish equilibrium between transparency and business sustainability.

コピー

企業の倫理コンサルタントとして、以下の具体的なビジネスシナリオに対する意思決定のアドバイスを提供してください。製薬会社が、長期使用で軽度だが致命的ではない副作用を持つベストセラー医薬品を発見したが、回収すると会社が破綻し数千人の従業員の生計が脅かされるケースです。功利主義による最大幸福の計算と義務論に基づく患者の知情権および人間の尊厳への尊重を組み合わせ、回収と不回収の両方の経路の道徳的重みを分析し、社会的責任と企業の存続のバランスを取る具体的な実行戦略を提案してください。透明性と事業の持続可能性の間の均衡をいかに確立するか重点的に説明してください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

倫理的意思決定支援

When handling specific business scenarios involving data privacy or supply chain labor rights, please combine utilitarian consequence assessment with deontological principles to analyze the potential impact on stakeholders, identify core ethical conflicts, and propose balanced recommendations that integrate compliance with humanistic care from multiple perspectives, ensuring decisions meet legal baselines while reflecting corporate social responsibility.

倫理的意思決定支援

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to provide decision-making advice for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its flagship drug has minor but under-disclosed side effects for long-term use, potentially affecting the health of certain sensitive groups, but a recall would bankrupt the company and impact the livelihoods of thousands of employees. Please analyze whether to proactively disclose information and initiate a voluntary recall by combining utilitarian consequence assessment with deontological considerations of honesty, while weighing the impacts on shareholders, patients, and employees, and finally provide a specific action framework that balances moral responsibility and corporate survival.

倫理的意思決定支援

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to conduct a moral risk assessment for the specific business scenario I provide, which involves a conflict between cost reduction and employee welfare. You need to combine the utilitarian consideration of maximizing overall benefits with the deontological respect for individual rights to analyze the potential impact on various stakeholders. Avoid simple binary judgments; instead, provide multi-dimensional ethical trade-off perspectives, point out potential moral blind spots, and offer decision-making advice that balances compliance and humanistic care, ensuring the final plan aligns with the enterprise's long-term sustainable development values.

倫理的意思決定支援

When an enterprise faces specific situations involving conflicts of interest among stakeholders, please conduct a multi-dimensional ethical weight analysis of alternative options by combining utilitarian consequence assessment with deontological principle constraints, identify potential unintended ethical risks, and recommend an action plan that achieves the best balance between short-term business goals and long-term social responsibility, ensuring the decision-making process is transparent and complies with industry ethical standards.

倫理的意思決定支援

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to provide decision-making advice for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company developing a new drug discovers slight but non-fatal side effects in clinical trial data, while a competitor is about to launch a similar product. Please analyze whether to delay the launch or modify promotional materials by combining utilitarian calculations for the greatest good with deontological adherence to honesty and patient safety principles, and offer a comprehensive strategy balancing business sustainability and moral responsibility, presenting the analysis in a natural, fluent narrative without rigid instructional language.

倫理的意思決定支援

Act as a corporate ethics committee to conduct a deep ethical assessment of the following specific business scenario: A major pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has minor but negligible side effects with long-term use, yet discontinuing it would cause some patients' conditions to worsen. Combine the utilitarian principle of the greatest happiness for the greatest number with the deontological requirement of respecting patient autonomy and informed consent to analyze the moral weight of three strategies: concealing information, issuing public warnings, or initiating a recall. Avoid simple right-or-wrong judgments; instead, construct a multi-dimensional evaluation framework including stakeholder impact, legal risks, brand reputation, and social trust. Finally, output an advisory action guide that aims to balance business sustainability with patient welfare, ensuring the decision-making process is transparent and adheres to the highest ethical standards.