Correction automatique de rapports de TP de physique universitaire

Maison

Liste de prompts IA

Académique/Enseignant

Correcteur de rapports de TP de physique

${:__('collect %s',Correcteur de rapports de TP de physique)}$

Académique/Enseignant

Corrige automatiquement les rapports de TP de physique des étudiants universitaires selon le barème, donne la note, marque les erreurs et propose des améliorations pour alléger la charge du professeur.

Contenu du prompt

Copier

Grade undergraduate basic physics lab reports according to the preset 100-point course rubric, check calculation processes in data processing, result error analysis, experimental conclusion derivation and discussion content, give a final score, mark incorrect or unreasonable content, and provide specific tailored improvement suggestions to help teachers finish grading work quickly.

Copier

Pour les rapports de travaux pratiques de physique fondamentale soumis par des étudiants de premier cycle universitaire, conformément au barème de notation préétabli sur 100 points, vérifiez les processus de calcul dans le traitement des données, l'analyse des erreurs de résultats, la déduction des conclusions expérimentales et le contenu de la discussion expérimentale, attribuez une note finale, marquez le contenu incorrect ou déraisonnable, et fournissez des suggestions d'amélioration spécifiques et ciblées pour aider les professeurs à terminer rapidement le travail de correction.

Copier

Partager Cliquez pour copier le lien

commentaires (0)

0/300

Soumettre

Recommandation

Relecture Grammaire

Please perform a deep language polish on the following academic paper paragraph, focusing on correcting grammatical errors, adjusting academic vocabulary to enhance professionalism, and optimizing logical connections between sentences to improve readability, while keeping the original meaning intact and adhering to the writing standards of the target journal.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as an academic writing expert. For the given research topic, review core literature from the past five years, extract main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and conclusion controversies, and synthesize them into a coherent review text. Ensure logical connections among at least five key citations, maintaining academic standards and rigorous logic.

Assistant de révision logique

Act as a senior academic editor to review the provided research paragraphs, focusing on the integrity and coherence of the argumentation chain. Identify potential leaps between premises and conclusions, flag risks of insufficient evidence support or reversed causality, and provide specific revision suggestions for each identified logical flaw. Ensure the final output maintains rigorous deductive relationships under academic standards while preserving natural, fluent, and professional objectivity.

Correcteur de thèse

Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing sentence fluency, vocabulary academic accuracy, and logical connection tightness while keeping the original meaning unchanged. Correct all grammatical errors and spelling issues, and convert colloquial expressions into formal academic written language. Finally, briefly explain the main modification points and their role in improving article readability, ensuring the output meets the language standards of top international journals.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as an academic consultant specializing in higher education. Based on the specific research topic and core reference list I provide, draft a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze key theoretical advancements from the last five years, identify gaps and controversies in existing research, and logically synthesize various scholars' viewpoints to build a coherent argument. Ensure the language style meets academic journal standards, avoid colloquialisms, and accurately cite the provided sources to support your arguments. Finally, output a continuous, critically thinking, and academically standardized review text.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as an academic writing consultant specializing in higher education. For the specific research topic I provide, such as 'Applications and Ethical Challenges of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging,' draft a rigorous literature review. First, outline key theoretical advancements from the last five years and identify major academic controversies, comparing differing school of thought views. Next, point out methodological limitations or data gaps in existing research. Finally, based on this analysis, propose innovative future research directions. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and proper citation norms, avoiding colloquialisms or empty statements, and output the review text directly.