Автоматическая проверка студенческих отчетов по физпрактикуму

Дом

Список AI-промптов

Академик/Преподаватель

Проверка отчетов по физике в вузе

${:__('collect %s',Проверка отчетов по физике в вузе)}$

Академик/Преподаватель

Проверяет отчеты по базовому физическому практикуму для младших курсов по критериям, выставляет оценку, отмечает ошибки и дает рекомендации, снижая нагрузку преподавателя.

Содержание промпта

Копировать

Grade undergraduate basic physics lab reports according to the preset 100-point course rubric, check calculation processes in data processing, result error analysis, experimental conclusion derivation and discussion content, give a final score, mark incorrect or unreasonable content, and provide specific tailored improvement suggestions to help teachers finish grading work quickly.

Копировать

Обрабатывает отчеты по базовому физическому практикуму для младших курсов вуза по заранее установленной 100-балльной шкале оценивания, проверяет правильность вычислений при обработке данных, анализ погрешностей результатов, выводы по эксперименту и содержание обсуждения работы, выставляет итоговую оценку, отмечает неверные или необоснованные фрагменты, предоставляет конкретные целевые рекомендации по улучшению, чтобы помочь преподавателю быстро завершить проверку работы.

Копировать

Поделиться Нажмите, чтобы скопировать ссылку

Комментарии (0)

0/300

Представлять на рассмотрение

Рекомендация

Коррекция Грамматики

Please perform a deep language polish on the following academic paper paragraph, focusing on correcting grammatical errors, adjusting academic vocabulary to enhance professionalism, and optimizing logical connections between sentences to improve readability, while keeping the original meaning intact and adhering to the writing standards of the target journal.

Помощник по обзору литературы

Act as an academic writing expert. For the given research topic, review core literature from the past five years, extract main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and conclusion controversies, and synthesize them into a coherent review text. Ensure logical connections among at least five key citations, maintaining academic standards and rigorous logic.

Ассистент проверки логики

Act as a senior academic editor to review the provided research paragraphs, focusing on the integrity and coherence of the argumentation chain. Identify potential leaps between premises and conclusions, flag risks of insufficient evidence support or reversed causality, and provide specific revision suggestions for each identified logical flaw. Ensure the final output maintains rigorous deductive relationships under academic standards while preserving natural, fluent, and professional objectivity.

Редактор статей

Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing sentence fluency, vocabulary academic accuracy, and logical connection tightness while keeping the original meaning unchanged. Correct all grammatical errors and spelling issues, and convert colloquial expressions into formal academic written language. Finally, briefly explain the main modification points and their role in improving article readability, ensuring the output meets the language standards of top international journals.

Помощник обзора литературы

Act as an academic consultant specializing in higher education. Based on the specific research topic and core reference list I provide, draft a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze key theoretical advancements from the last five years, identify gaps and controversies in existing research, and logically synthesize various scholars' viewpoints to build a coherent argument. Ensure the language style meets academic journal standards, avoid colloquialisms, and accurately cite the provided sources to support your arguments. Finally, output a continuous, critically thinking, and academically standardized review text.

Помощник обзора литературы

Act as an academic writing consultant specializing in higher education. For the specific research topic I provide, such as 'Applications and Ethical Challenges of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging,' draft a rigorous literature review. First, outline key theoretical advancements from the last five years and identify major academic controversies, comparing differing school of thought views. Next, point out methodological limitations or data gaps in existing research. Finally, based on this analysis, propose innovative future research directions. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and proper citation norms, avoiding colloquialisms or empty statements, and output the review text directly.