New AI Models from OpenAI Exhibit Higher Hallucination Rates in Reasoning Tasks

OpenAI’s newly released o3 and o4-mini AI models excel in multiple areas but show increased hallucination tendencies compared to earlier models, generating more fabricated information.
Hallucinations remain a persistent challenge in AI, even for top-tier systems. Typically, newer models reduce hallucination rates, but o3 and o4-mini deviate from this trend.
Internal OpenAI tests reveal that o3 and o4-mini, designed as reasoning models, hallucinate more frequently than prior reasoning models like o1, o1-mini, and o3-mini, as well as non-reasoning models like GPT-4o.
The cause of this increase remains unclear to OpenAI, raising concerns.
OpenAI’s technical report on o3 and o4-mini notes that further research is needed to pinpoint why hallucination rates rise with scaled-up reasoning models. While these models outperform in areas like coding and math, their tendency to make more claims leads to both accurate and inaccurate outputs, according to the report.
On OpenAI’s PersonQA benchmark, o3 hallucinated in 33% of responses, doubling the rates of o1 (16%) and o3-mini (14.8%). O4-mini performed worse, hallucinating in 48% of cases.
Transluce, a nonprofit AI research group, found o3 fabricating actions, such as claiming it ran code on a 2021 MacBook Pro outside ChatGPT, despite lacking such capabilities.
“We suspect the reinforcement learning used in o-series models may exacerbate issues typically lessened by standard post-training methods,” said Transluce researcher and former OpenAI employee Neil Chowdhury in an email to TechCrunch.
Transluce co-founder Sarah Schwettmann noted that o3’s hallucination rate could reduce its practical utility.
Kian Katanforoosh, Stanford adjunct professor and Workera CEO, told TechCrunch his team found o3 superior for coding workflows but prone to generating broken website links.
While hallucinations can spark creative ideas, they pose challenges for industries like law, where accuracy is critical and errors in documents are unacceptable.
Integrating web search capabilities shows promise for improving accuracy. OpenAI’s GPT-4o with web search achieves 90% accuracy on SimpleQA, suggesting potential for reducing hallucination in reasoning models when users allow third-party search access.
If scaling reasoning models continues to increase hallucinations, finding solutions will become increasingly critical.
“Improving model accuracy and reliability is a key focus of our ongoing research,” said OpenAI spokesperson Niko Felix in an email to TechCrunch.
The AI industry has recently shifted toward reasoning models, which enhance performance without requiring extensive computing resources. However, this shift appears to increase hallucination risks, presenting a significant challenge.
Related article
PHP Armageddon: OpenAI, Google’s Wiz uncover ancient holes, sparking internet panic
The U.S. National Security Agency issued a critical alert on Wednesday regarding two severe vulnerabilities in PHP, for which patches have already been released by the PHP Foundation.As a server-side scripting language, PHP powers approximately 70% o
Google AI Overviews Gain Ground in Search Results
According to Similarweb’s 2026 Generative AI Landscape report, Google’s AI-generated summaries appeared in 43% of US searches, a significant rise from 15% recorded a year prior.While AI Overviews present generated summaries within standard search res
OpenAI launches GPT-5.5 Instant as ChatGPT’s new default model
OpenAI launched GPT-5.5 Instant on Monday, replacing GPT-5.3 Instant as the default ChatGPT model. The company states that this update minimizes hallucinations in high-stakes fields like law, medicine, and finance, while preserving the fast response
Related Special Topic Recommendations
Comments (4)
0/500
It's wild how OpenAI's new models are so advanced yet still make stuff up! 😅 I wonder if these hallucinations could lead to some creative breakthroughs or just more AI headaches.
I read about OpenAI's new models and, wow, those hallucination rates are concerning! If AI starts making up stuff more often, how can we trust it for serious tasks? 🤔 Still, their capabilities sound impressive.
These new AI models sound powerful, but more hallucinations? That's like a sci-fi plot gone wrong! 🧠 Hope they fix it soon.

OpenAI’s newly released o3 and o4-mini AI models excel in multiple areas but show increased hallucination tendencies compared to earlier models, generating more fabricated information.
Hallucinations remain a persistent challenge in AI, even for top-tier systems. Typically, newer models reduce hallucination rates, but o3 and o4-mini deviate from this trend.
Internal OpenAI tests reveal that o3 and o4-mini, designed as reasoning models, hallucinate more frequently than prior reasoning models like o1, o1-mini, and o3-mini, as well as non-reasoning models like GPT-4o.
The cause of this increase remains unclear to OpenAI, raising concerns.
OpenAI’s technical report on o3 and o4-mini notes that further research is needed to pinpoint why hallucination rates rise with scaled-up reasoning models. While these models outperform in areas like coding and math, their tendency to make more claims leads to both accurate and inaccurate outputs, according to the report.
On OpenAI’s PersonQA benchmark, o3 hallucinated in 33% of responses, doubling the rates of o1 (16%) and o3-mini (14.8%). O4-mini performed worse, hallucinating in 48% of cases.
Transluce, a nonprofit AI research group, found o3 fabricating actions, such as claiming it ran code on a 2021 MacBook Pro outside ChatGPT, despite lacking such capabilities.
“We suspect the reinforcement learning used in o-series models may exacerbate issues typically lessened by standard post-training methods,” said Transluce researcher and former OpenAI employee Neil Chowdhury in an email to TechCrunch.
Transluce co-founder Sarah Schwettmann noted that o3’s hallucination rate could reduce its practical utility.
Kian Katanforoosh, Stanford adjunct professor and Workera CEO, told TechCrunch his team found o3 superior for coding workflows but prone to generating broken website links.
While hallucinations can spark creative ideas, they pose challenges for industries like law, where accuracy is critical and errors in documents are unacceptable.
Integrating web search capabilities shows promise for improving accuracy. OpenAI’s GPT-4o with web search achieves 90% accuracy on SimpleQA, suggesting potential for reducing hallucination in reasoning models when users allow third-party search access.
If scaling reasoning models continues to increase hallucinations, finding solutions will become increasingly critical.
“Improving model accuracy and reliability is a key focus of our ongoing research,” said OpenAI spokesperson Niko Felix in an email to TechCrunch.
The AI industry has recently shifted toward reasoning models, which enhance performance without requiring extensive computing resources. However, this shift appears to increase hallucination risks, presenting a significant challenge.
PHP Armageddon: OpenAI, Google’s Wiz uncover ancient holes, sparking internet panic
The U.S. National Security Agency issued a critical alert on Wednesday regarding two severe vulnerabilities in PHP, for which patches have already been released by the PHP Foundation.As a server-side scripting language, PHP powers approximately 70% o
Google AI Overviews Gain Ground in Search Results
According to Similarweb’s 2026 Generative AI Landscape report, Google’s AI-generated summaries appeared in 43% of US searches, a significant rise from 15% recorded a year prior.While AI Overviews present generated summaries within standard search res
OpenAI launches GPT-5.5 Instant as ChatGPT’s new default model
OpenAI launched GPT-5.5 Instant on Monday, replacing GPT-5.3 Instant as the default ChatGPT model. The company states that this update minimizes hallucinations in high-stakes fields like law, medicine, and finance, while preserving the fast response
It's wild how OpenAI's new models are so advanced yet still make stuff up! 😅 I wonder if these hallucinations could lead to some creative breakthroughs or just more AI headaches.
I read about OpenAI's new models and, wow, those hallucination rates are concerning! If AI starts making up stuff more often, how can we trust it for serious tasks? 🤔 Still, their capabilities sound impressive.
These new AI models sound powerful, but more hallucinations? That's like a sci-fi plot gone wrong! 🧠 Hope they fix it soon.





Home






