sentry-incident-runbook
jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills
Procedimentos de resposta a incidentes utilizando o Sentry. Utilize-os ao investigar problemas de produção, classificar erros ou criar fluxos de trabalho para a resposta a incidentes. Ative-os com frases como “sentry incident response”, “sentry triage”, “investigate sentry error” ou “sentry runbook”.
...Expandir tudoSobre o sentry-incident-runbook
A habilidade “sentry-incident-runbook” foi desenvolvida para simplificar os procedimentos de resposta a incidentes no Sentry. Ela ajuda os usuários a investigar problemas de produção, classificar erros e criar fluxos de trabalho de resposta a incidentes de maneira estruturada e eficiente. Ao se integrar com o Sentry, essa habilidade facilita a gestão dos incidentes desde sua detecção até a resolução, garantindo uma abordagem sistemática para lidar com erros críticos e minimizar os tempos de inatividade do sistema. É essencial para equipes responsáveis pela manutenção da confiabilidade dos ambientes de produção, permitindo que respondam rapidamente e efetivamente a problemas.
As principais funcionalidades incluem a classificação da gravidade dos incidentes usando o framework P0-P3, a triagem de incidentes com uma lista de verificação detalhada, e o uso dos comandos da API do Sentry para coletar informações sobre os problemas e eventos. A habilidade também facilita a aplicação de etapas pré-definidas de resolução, dependendo da natureza do erro – seja um problema de implantação, falha de terceiros, corrupção de dados ou esgotamento de recursos. Além disso, os usuários podem documentar suas descobertas, gerar relatórios pós-mortem e comunicar o status dos incidentes usando modelos pré-construídos. O público-alvo são equipes que precisam gerenciar problemas e erros de produção de maneira oportuna e estruturada, garantindo que os fluxos de trabalho sejam seguidos e que cada incidente seja devidamente documentado e resolvido.
A habilidade “sentry-incident-runbook” é perfeita para engenheiros DevOps, profissionais responsáveis pela resposta a incidentes e qualquer equipe técnica envolvida no gerenciamento de erros e solução de problemas. É especialmente útil em ambientes onde uma resposta rápida e documentação clara são essenciais para evitar a recorrência de problemas e manter um sistema de produção funcionando sem interrupções.
Perguntas Frequentes
Quais são os pré-requisitos para usar essa habilidade?
Você precisa ter uma conta no Sentry com acesso aos problemas do projeto, regras de alerta configuradas para erros críticos, canais de notificação da equipe definidos (por exemplo, Slack, PagerDuty), e um entendimento da classificação da gravidade dos erros.
Como classifico a gravidade de um incidente?
A gravidade do incidente é classificada usando o framework P0-P3, com base na taxa de erro e no impacto para os usuários. P0 representa a maior gravidade, indicando um problema crítico.
Posso usar essa habilidade sem ter uma conta ativa no Sentry?
Não, você precisa ter uma conta no Sentry com acesso aos problemas do projeto para usar essa habilidade de forma eficaz.
Há alguma limitação nos tipos de incidentes que posso gerenciar com essa habilidade?
Essa habilidade foi desenvolvida para funcionar com incidentes rastreados no Sentry, mas sua funcionalidade é limitada ao que o Sentry suporta, como a detecção de padrões de erro e a classificação da gravidade.
O que acontece após a resolução de um incidente?
Após a resolução, a habilidade ajuda a gerar um relatório pós-mortem e documenta a causa raiz do problema, o cronograma de resolução e outras informações relevantes.
Sentry Incident Runbook
Overview
Structured incident response framework built on Sentry's error monitoring platform. Covers the full lifecycle from alert detection through severity classification, root cause investigation using Sentry's breadcrumbs and stack traces, Discover queries for impact analysis, stakeholder communication, resolution via the Sentry API, and postmortem documentation with Sentry data exports.
Prerequisites
- Sentry account with project-level access and auth token (
SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN) - Organization slug (
SENTRY_ORG) and project slug (SENTRY_PROJECT) configured @sentry/node(v8+) or equivalent SDK installed in the application- Alert rules configured for critical error thresholds
- Notification channels connected (Slack integration or PagerDuty)
Instructions
Step 1 — Classify Severity
Assign a severity level based on error frequency and user impact. This determines response time and escalation path.
| Severity | Error Criteria | User Impact | Response Time | Escalation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 — Critical | Crash-free rate below 95% or unhandled exception spike >500/min | Core flow blocked for all users, data loss risk | 15 minutes | PagerDuty page to on-call engineer |
| P1 — Major | New issue affecting >100 unique users per hour | Key feature degraded, no workaround | 1 hour | Slack #incidents channel, tag team lead |
| P2 — Minor | New issue affecting <100 unique users per hour | Feature degraded but workaround exists | Same business day | Slack #alerts-production |
| P3 — Low | Edge case, cosmetic error, staging-only issue | Minimal or no user-facing impact | Next sprint | Add to backlog, assign owner |
Decision logic for classification:
Alert fires →├── Check crash-free rate (Project Settings → Crash Free Sessions)│ └── Below 95%? → P0├── Check unique users affected (Issue Details → Users tab)│ ├── >100/hr on core flow? → P1│ └── <100/hr or workaround exists? → P2└── Staging-only or edge case? → P3Step 2 — Triage and Investigate
Execute this checklist within the first 15 minutes of a P0/P1 alert.
Initial triage (Sentry UI):
- Open the Sentry issue link from the alert notification
- Check the error frequency graph — determine if the rate is spiking, steady, or declining
- Read the "First Seen" and "Last Seen" timestamps to determine if this is new or a regression
- Check the "Users" count on the issue to quantify impact
- Verify the environment filter — confirm this is production, not staging
- Check the "Release" tag — identify which deployment introduced the error
- Open "Suspect Commits" to find the likely-causal changeset
Deep investigation (stack trace and breadcrumbs):
- Read the full stack trace — identify the failing function and line number
- Expand the breadcrumbs panel — trace the sequence of events leading to the error (HTTP requests, console logs, navigation, UI clicks)
- Check the user context panel for device, browser, OS, and custom user tags
- Review the "Tags" panel for patterns (specific release, region, browser)
API-based investigation:
# Fetch issue details programmaticallycurl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" \ "https://sentry.io/api/0/organizations/$SENTRY_ORG/issues/$ISSUE_ID/" \ | python3 -c "import json, sysissue = json.load(sys.stdin)print(f'Title: {issue[\"title\"]}')print(f'First Seen: {issue[\"firstSeen\"]}')print(f'Last Seen: {issue[\"lastSeen\"]}')print(f'Events: {issue[\"count\"]}')print(f'Users: {issue[\"userCount\"]}')print(f'Level: {issue[\"level\"]}')print(f'Status: {issue[\"status\"]}')print(f'Platform: {issue.get(\"platform\", \"unknown\")}')" || echo "ERROR: Failed to fetch issue — check SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN and ISSUE_ID"# Fetch latest events for the issue (most recent 5)curl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" \ "https://sentry.io/api/0/organizations/$SENTRY_ORG/issues/$ISSUE_ID/events/?per_page=5" \ | python3 -c "import json, sysevents = json.load(sys.stdin)for e in events: release = e.get('release', {}) ver = release.get('version', 'N/A') if isinstance(release, dict) else 'N/A' print(f'Event {e[\"eventID\"][:12]} | {e.get(\"dateCreated\", \"N/A\")} | Release: {ver}')" || echo "ERROR: Failed to fetch events"
Sentry Discover queries for impact analysis:
# Count total events and unique affected users in last 24 hourscurl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" \ "https://sentry.io/api/0/organizations/$SENTRY_ORG/events/" \ --data-urlencode "field=count()" \ --data-urlencode "field=count_unique(user)" \ --data-urlencode "query=issue.id:$ISSUE_ID" \ --data-urlencode "statsPeriod=24h" \ -G | python3 -c "import json, sysdata = json.load(sys.stdin)if 'data' in data and data['data']: row = data['data'][0] print(f'Events (24h): {row.get(\"count()\", \"N/A\")}') print(f'Unique users (24h): {row.get(\"count_unique(user)\", \"N/A\")}')" || echo "ERROR: Discover query failed"# Check p95 transaction duration for affected endpointcurl -s -H "Authorization: Bearer $SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" \ "https://sentry.io/api/0/organizations/$SENTRY_ORG/events/" \ --data-urlencode "field=transaction" \ --data-urlencode "field=p95(transaction.duration)" \ --data-urlencode "field=count()" \ --data-urlencode "query=has:transaction event.type:transaction" \ --data-urlencode "statsPeriod=1h" \ --data-urlencode "sort=-count()" \ --data-urlencode "per_page=5" \ -G | python3 -c "import json, sysdata = json.load(sys.stdin)if 'data' in data: for row in data['data']: txn = row.get('transaction', 'unknown') p95 = row.get('p95(transaction.duration)', 0) cnt = row.get('count()', 0) print(f'{txn}: p95={p95:.0f}ms, count={cnt}')" || echo "ERROR: Transaction query failed"
Step 3 — Resolve, Communicate, and Document
Identify the root cause pattern:
| Pattern | Diagnostic Signal | Immediate Action |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment regression | "First Seen" aligns with latest deploy timestamp | Rollback via sentry-cli releases deploys $PREV_VERSION new --env production |
| Third-party failure | Breadcrumbs show failed HTTP calls to external hosts | Enable circuit breaker, add retry logic, monitor dependency status |
| Data corruption | Event context contains malformed input samples | Add input validation, fix data pipeline upstream |
| Resource exhaustion | Error rate correlates with traffic spikes (OOM, pool exhaustion) | Scale horizontally, add connection pooling, implement rate limiting |
| SDK misconfiguration | Events missing context, breadcrumbs, or release info | Review Sentry.init() options, verify source maps uploaded |
Resolve the issue via Sentry API:
# Mark issue as resolved (closes the issue)curl -s -X PUT \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"status": "resolved"}' \ "https://sentry.io/api/0/organizations/$SENTRY_ORG/issues/$ISSUE_ID/" \ | python3 -c "import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(f'Status: {d.get(\"status\",\"unknown\")}')" \ || echo "ERROR: Failed to resolve issue"# Resolve in next release (auto-reopens on regression)curl -s -X PUT \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"status": "resolved", "statusDetails": {"inNextRelease": true}}' \ "https://sentry.io/api/0/organizations/$SENTRY_ORG/issues/$ISSUE_ID/" \ | python3 -c "import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(f'Status: {d.get(\"status\",\"unknown\")} (regression detection enabled)')" \ || echo "ERROR: Failed to resolve issue"# Ignore with threshold (snooze until count exceeds limit)# Use 100 as the re-alert threshold for noisy low-severity issuescurl -s -X PUT \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $SENTRY_AUTH_TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"status": "ignored", "statusDetails": {"ignoreCount": 100}}' \ "https://sentry.io/api/0/organizations/$SENTRY_ORG/issues/$ISSUE_ID/" \ | python3 -c "import json,sys; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(f'Status: {d.get(\"status\",\"unknown\")} (snoozed until 100 events)')" \ || echo "ERROR: Failed to ignore issue"
Stakeholder communication templates:
Initial alert (send within 15 minutes of P0):
INCIDENT — [Service Name]Status: InvestigatingImpact: [Description of user-facing symptoms]Started: [Timestamp from Sentry "First Seen"]Sentry Issue: [Link to issue]Incident Lead: @[on-call engineer]Next update: 30 minutesResolution notice:
RESOLVED — [Service Name]Duration: [Total incident time from first alert to resolution]Root Cause: [One-line description from investigation]Fix Applied: [What changed — rollback, hotfix, config change]Postmortem: [Link — due within 48 hours]Postmortem template with Sentry data:
## Incident Postmortem: [Title from Sentry Issue]### Timeline- [HH:MM] Alert fired — Sentry issue [ISSUE_ID] created- [HH:MM] On-call engineer acknowledged- [HH:MM] Root cause identified via [breadcrumbs / stack trace / suspect commits]- [HH:MM] Fix deployed — [rollback / hotfix description]- [HH:MM] Error rate returned to baseline, issue resolved in Sentry### Impact (from Sentry Discover)- **Duration:** [X hours Y minutes]- **Total events:** [count() from Discover query]- **Unique users affected:** [count_unique(user) from Discover query]- **p95 latency during incident:** [p95(transaction.duration) from Discover]### Root Cause (5 Whys)1. Why did the error occur? [Direct cause from stack trace]2. Why was that code path triggered? [From breadcrumbs]3. Why was it not caught in testing? [Gap analysis]4. Why did the alert take [X] minutes? [Alert rule review]5. Why is this class of error possible? [Systemic cause]### Action Items- [ ] [Preventive measure] — Owner: @[name] — Due: [date]- [ ] Update Sentry alert rules to catch [pattern] earlier- [ ] Add regression test covering [scenario from breadcrumbs]- [ ] Review and tighten ownership rules for [component]
Output
- Severity classification (P0-P3) based on error frequency and user impact
- Completed triage checklist with root cause identification
- Sentry Discover query results quantifying incident impact
- API-driven issue resolution with regression detection enabled
- Stakeholder communication messages (initial alert + resolution)
- Postmortem document populated with Sentry data exports
Error Handling
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
401 Unauthorized from Sentry API | Auth token expired or lacks org-level scope | Regenerate token at Settings > Developer Settings > Internal Integrations with event:read, issue:write scopes |
| Alert fatigue — too many P2/P3 alerts | Alert rules trigger on every event instead of thresholds | Change alert condition to "New issue" or "Event frequency > N in M minutes" |
| Suspect Commits shows wrong commit | Release association not configured | Run sentry-cli releases set-commits --auto in CI pipeline |
| Missing breadcrumbs in events | SDK not capturing HTTP/console/navigation breadcrumbs | Verify Sentry.init({ integrations: [breadcrumbsIntegration()] }) and check maxBreadcrumbs setting |
| Issue keeps regressing after resolve | Root cause not fully addressed, only symptom fixed | Use "Resolve in next release" for auto-reopen, add regression test |
| Discover query returns empty data | Wrong time range or missing event.type filter | Expand statsPeriod to 7d, verify query syntax in Sentry Discover UI first |
Examples
Example 1 — P0 payment failure spike:
An alert fires: PaymentProcessingError with 200 events in 5 minutes. Triage reveals crash-free rate dropped to 91%. Breadcrumbs show the Stripe webhook handler receiving malformed payloads after a Stripe API version change. Suspect Commits points to a dependency update merged 20 minutes ago. Resolution: rollback the deployment, resolve the Sentry issue with inNextRelease, file a postmortem with the 5 Whys showing the missing Stripe API version pin.
Example 2 — P2 intermittent 503 from upstream API:
Sentry shows ServiceUnavailableError affecting 40 users/hour. Discover query reveals count() = 180, count_unique(user) = 40, p95(transaction.duration) = 8200ms. Breadcrumbs show the third-party geocoding API returning 503. Resolution: enable the circuit breaker fallback to cached results, ignore the Sentry issue with ignoreCount: 100, create a backlog item to add a secondary geocoding provider.
Example 3 — P1 new unhandled exception after deploy:
A TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined appears immediately after a release tagged v2.4.1. First Seen matches the deploy timestamp. Stack trace points to a renamed API response field. Suspect Commits identifies the exact PR. Resolution: deploy hotfix renaming the field access, resolve the issue tied to v2.4.2, update the postmortem with Discover data showing 320 affected users over 45 minutes.
Resources
- Sentry Issue Details — anatomy of an issue page
- Sentry Alerts — configuring alert rules and thresholds
- Sentry Discover Queries — building impact analysis queries
- Issues API — programmatic issue management
- Ownership Rules — auto-assigning issues to teams
@sentry/nodeSDK — Node.js SDK configuration
Next Steps
For configuring Sentry alerts and error capture, see sentry-error-capture. For CI/CD integration with Sentry releases, see sentry-ci-integration. For performance monitoring and tracing, see sentry-performance-tracing.
Instalar sentry-incident-runbook
Baixe e extraia os arquivos de habilidades para o seu diretório .claude/skills/.
Baixar ZIPClone o repositório e copie os arquivos da habilidade para o seu projeto.
git clone https://github.com/jeremylongshore/claude-code-plugins-plus-skills/blob/main/plugins/saas-packs/sentry-pack/skills/sentry-incident-runbook/SKILL.md # Copy SKILL.md to your .claude/skills/ directory
Copiar





Lar
