Step-2-16k-Exp VS InternLM3-8B-Instruct
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16k-Exp | StepFun | January 16, 2025 | N/A | 5.2 |
| InternLM3-8B-Instruct | Shanghai AI Laboratory | January 15, 2025 | 8B | 4.2 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16k-Exp VS InternLM3-8B-Instruct AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Step-2-16k-Exp handles tasks reasonably well; InternLM3-8B-Instruct often produces incoherent or disconnected responses.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
