Step-2-16K VS GLM-4-9B-Chat
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 5.2 |
| GLM-4-9B-Chat | Zhipu AI | June 4, 2024 | 9B | 3.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16K VS GLM-4-9B-Chat AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models are unreliable with high error rates, unsuitable for meaningful tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
GLM-4-9B-Chat possesses mid-level computational reasoning, sufficient for general tasks. Step-2-16K frequently fails, lacking reliable solutions.
