Step-2-16K VS ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 5.2 |
| ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K | Baidu | April 25, 2025 | N/A | 7.2 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16K VS ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K may not be top-tier but is practically useful, whereas Step-2-16K fails to effectively complete most command-based or multi-step tasks.
Language Understanding Comparison
ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K shows strong capabilities; Step-2-16K often outputs faulty language, unsuitable for high-quality interaction.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
