Step-2-16K VS GPT-4o-20240513
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 6.5 |
| GPT-4o-20240513 | OpenAI | May 13, 2024 | N/A | 6.7 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Step-2-16K VS GPT-4o-20240513 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
GPT-4o-20240513 shows relatively better task comprehension and completion, while Step-2-16K has inconsistent performance and unstable output quality.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models are unreliable with high error rates, unsuitable for meaningful tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
GPT-4o-20240513 handles typical reasoning tasks effectively. Step-2-16K often generates flawed outputs or lacks contextual consistency.
