Qwen2.5-Max VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking)
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen2.5-Max | Alibaba | January 28, 2025 | N/A | 5.7 |
| Qwen3-32B (Thinking) | Alibaba | April 29, 2025 | 32B | 7.1 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Qwen2.5-Max VS Qwen3-32B (Thinking) AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) may not be top-tier but is practically useful, whereas Qwen2.5-Max fails to effectively complete most command-based or multi-step tasks.
Language Understanding Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) is more consistent; Qwen2.5-Max has weaknesses in logic and semantics.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Qwen3-32B (Thinking) has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. Qwen2.5-Max frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
