Llama4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct VS Llama4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct | Meta | April 5, 2025 | 400B | 5.6 |
| Llama4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | Meta | April 5, 2025 | 109B | 5.2 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Llama4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct VS Llama4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models fail to meet the threshold for practical language tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
