GLM-Z1-32B-0414 VS GLM-4-32B-0414
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-Z1-32B-0414 | Zhipu AI | April 14, 2025 | 32B | 6.9 |
| GLM-4-32B-0414 | Zhipu AI | April 14, 2025 | 32B | 6 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of GLM-Z1-32B-0414 VS GLM-4-32B-0414 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
GLM-Z1-32B-0414 shows relatively better task comprehension and completion, while GLM-4-32B-0414 has inconsistent performance and unstable output quality.
Language Understanding Comparison
GLM-Z1-32B-0414 performs well across most tasks; GLM-4-32B-0414’s output is error-prone and weak in complex scenarios.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
