GLM-4-Plus VS Step-2-16K
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-4-Plus | Zhipu AI | August 30, 2024 | N/A | 5.8 |
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 5.4 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of GLM-4-Plus VS Step-2-16K AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Step-2-16K is slightly more reliable in basic expressions; GLM-4-Plus lacks semantic consistency.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
