GLM-4-Plus VS ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-4-Plus | Zhipu AI | August 30, 2024 | N/A | 5.8 |
| ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K | Baidu | April 25, 2025 | N/A | 7.2 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of GLM-4-Plus VS ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K may not be top-tier but is practically useful, whereas GLM-4-Plus fails to effectively complete most command-based or multi-step tasks.
Language Understanding Comparison
ERNIE-X1-Turbo-32K performs well across most tasks; GLM-4-Plus’s output is error-prone and weak in complex scenarios.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
