GLM-4-Plus VS Bailing-Lite-1116
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-4-Plus | Zhipu AI | August 30, 2024 | N/A | 5.8 |
| Bailing-Lite-1116 | Ant Group | November 16, 2024 | N/A | 4.7 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of GLM-4-Plus VS Bailing-Lite-1116 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Limited abilities with fluctuating quality and frequent misunderstandings.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models are inadequate in reasoning and computation, frequently failing and unable to handle practical analytical tasks.
