GLM-4 VS Bailing-Lite-1116
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLM-4 | Zhipu AI | January 16, 2024 | N/A | 5.6 |
| Bailing-Lite-1116 | Ant Group | November 15, 2024 | N/A | 5.3 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of GLM-4 VS Bailing-Lite-1116 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models fail to meet the threshold for practical language tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Both models have poor reasoning capabilities, frequently producing invalid or unusable results.
