Gemma-2-27B-it VS Bailing-Lite-1116
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemma-2-27B-it | June 27, 2024 | 27B | 3.5 | |
| Bailing-Lite-1116 | Ant Group | November 15, 2024 | N/A | 5.3 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Gemma-2-27B-it VS Bailing-Lite-1116 AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Both models are unreliable with high error rates, unsuitable for meaningful tasks.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Gemma-2-27B-it exhibits high-level computational reasoning. Bailing-Lite-1116 produces frequent errors, making it difficult to rely on for complex problem-solving.
