Claude3-Opus VS Step-2-16K
| Model Name | Affiliated organization | Release time | Model parameter quantity | Comprehensive score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude3-Opus | Anthropic | March 4, 2024 | N/A | 5.9 |
| Step-2-16K | StepFun | July 4, 2024 | N/A | 5.4 |
Comprehensive score
Language dialogue
Knowledge reserve
Reasoning association
Mathematical calculation
Code writing
Command following
Swipe left and right to view more
Brief Comparison of Claude3-Opus VS Step-2-16K AI Models
Comprehensive Capability Comparison
Neither model possesses practical application capabilities, frequently producing erroneous outputs with extremely low task completion rates.
Language Understanding Comparison
Step-2-16K handles basic tasks; Claude3-Opus often fails to communicate effectively.
Mathematical Reasoning Comparison
Claude3-Opus has some limitations but remains functional for simple tasks. Step-2-16K frequently fails and is ineffective for meaningful reasoning.
