기업 윤리적 딜레마 분석

집

AI 프롬프트 목록

철학/종교

윤리적 의사결정 지원

${:__('collect %s',윤리적 의사결정 지원)}$

철학/종교

비즈니스의 도덕적 딜레마에 대해 공리주의와 의무론에 기반한 균형 잡힌 분석을 제공하여 가치에 부합하는 의사결정을 내리도록 관리자를 지원합니다.

프롬프트 내용

복사

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to conduct a deep moral deduction on the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has mild but irreversible neurological side effects with long-term use, yet discontinuing the drug would cause severe deterioration for many chronic patients. Please analyze the trade-offs between disclosing information, adjusting pricing, reformulating, or suspending sales by integrating utilitarian considerations of overall well-being with deontological adherence to patient informed consent and non-maleficence principles. Provide a final action recommendation that balances commercial sustainability with social responsibility, focusing on how to establish moral priority amidst conflicting interests.

복사

시니어 기업 윤리 고문으로서 다음 구체적인 비즈니스 시나리오에 대해 깊은 도덕적 추론을 수행하십시오. 제약 회사가 장기 사용 시 경미하지만 비가역적인 신경 부작용을 가진 베스트셀러 의약품을 발견했지만, 중단하면 많은 만성 환자의 상태가 악화되는 상황을 고려하십시오. 전반적인 복지에 대한 공리주의적 고려와 환자의 사전 동의 및 해악 금지 원칙에 대한 의무론적 준수를 통합하여 정보 공개, 가격 조정, 처방 변경 또는 판매 중단 간의 트레이드오프를 분석하십시오. 상업적 지속 가능성과 사회적 책임의 균형을 맞추고, 대립하는 이익 속에서 도덕적 우선순위를 확립하는 방법에 중점을 두고 최종 행동 권장 사항을 제공하십시오.

복사

공유 링크를 복사하려면 클릭

의견 (1)

0/300

제출하다

JustinAnderson

2026년 10월 2일 오전 5시 26분 33초 GMT+09:00

这个Ethical Decision Support提示词设计得很专业，把功利主义和义务论结合得不错。药企案例很真实，权衡披露、定价和停售的逻辑清晰。不过作为普通用户，感觉执行起来对AI的要求挺高，可能得反复调试才能拿到满意方案。期待用它做商业伦理课的作业素材！

추천

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Please analyze the ethical conflict involved in the following business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its marketed drug has minor but non-fatal side effects with long-term use, yet stopping the medication carries higher risks. Please evaluate whether the company should proactively recall the drug and disclose information, combining the utilitarian principle of the greatest happiness for the greatest number with the deontological requirement of respecting patient autonomy and informed consent. Consider the impacts on multiple stakeholders including shareholders, patient safety, legal compliance, and corporate reputation, and provide an ethical decision recommendation that balances these interests, explaining how this decision achieves a balance between moral responsibility and business sustainability.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has mild but foreseeable side effects with long-term use, increasing long-term health risks for patients, while discontinuing the drug would worsen current acute symptoms. Please evaluate whether to proactively recall and disclose this risk by combining the impact on overall well-being from a utilitarian perspective with respect for patient informed consent from a deontological perspective, while considering the long-term impact on shareholder interests, corporate reputation, and patient trust, ultimately providing an action recommendation that balances moral responsibility with business sustainability.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Please conduct an ethical analysis for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug, when taken long-term, has a slight but predictable side effect increasing the probability of cardiovascular risk by 0.5%, while discontinuing the drug would lead to worsening conditions for most patients. Please evaluate the moral rationality of three options—continuing sales, reducing price with mandatory risk disclosure, or immediate recall—by combining the utilitarian principle of maximizing happiness with the deontological principles of respecting patient autonomy and non-maleficence, and provide a recommended decision path that balances shareholder interests with patient well-being, ensuring the argument is logically rigorous and aligns with modern business ethics standards.

윤리적 의사결정 보조자

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze a conflict case involving data privacy and commercial interests using utilitarian and deontological frameworks. Evaluate the rights of different stakeholders, weigh short-term commercial gains against long-term social trust, and provide an action plan that balances legal compliance with moral responsibility, ensuring the decision-making process is transparent and aligns with corporate values.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to conduct a deep moral assessment of the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has mild but irreversible neurological side effects with long-term use, yet discontinuing the drug would cause severe deterioration for many patients. Please combine the utilitarian principle of the greatest happiness for the greatest number with the deontological principles of respecting patient autonomy and non-maleficence to analyze the ethical weights of continuing sales, recalling, or reducing dosage. Avoid simple right-or-wrong judgments; instead, derive a comprehensive decision recommendation balancing commercial sustainability and moral底线 from the perspectives of stakeholder impact, corporate social responsibility, and legal compliance, explaining how this decision reflects the company's core values.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its marketed drug has severe side effects in a very small subset of individuals with specific genetic markers, but the cost of recall would bankrupt the company and disrupt treatment for thousands of ordinary patients. Evaluate the ethical weights of three options—full recall, partial warning, or status quo—by combining utilitarian calculations for the greatest good with deontological duties regarding patient safety and informed consent. Provide a comprehensive recommendation that balances business survival with moral integrity, focusing on how to establish a priority sequence of values amidst conflicting interests.