教員向け文献レビュー作成

家

AIプロンプト一覧

学者/教師

論文文献レビュー支援

${:__('collect %s',論文文献レビュー支援)}$

学者/教師

特定の学問分野に焦点を当て、大学教員が効率的に研究の脈絡を整理するための学術文献レビュー生成プロンプト。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Act as an academic assistant specializing in education. Based on the specific subject theme and core reference list I provide, draft a rigorous literature review. You need to outline key research progress in this field over the past five years, identify major academic controversies, summarize the limitations of existing studies, and finally propose forward-looking future research directions, ensuring the language meets academic standards and the logic is coherent.

コピー

あなたは教育学を専門とする学術アシスタントとして行動してください。私が提供する特定の学問テーマとコア参考文献リストに基づいて、厳格な文献レビューを作成してください。過去5年間のこの分野の主要な研究進捗を整理し、主要な学術論争点を特定し、既存研究の限界を要約し、最後に先見性のある将来の研究方向を提案する必要があります。言語は学術基準を満たし、論理が一貫していることを確保してください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, deeply analyze key academic literature from the past five years, identify major theoretical schools and research controversies, trace the evolution of research, and synthesize existing findings to point out current research gaps and future directions. Finally, output a logically rigorous, properly cited, and academically toned literature review draft to help me quickly construct the theoretical framework of my paper.

論文文法校正アシスタント

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, enhancing the academic precision of vocabulary, and optimizing sentence structures to improve logical coherence, while keeping the original meaning intact, ensuring the final text meets the publication standards of high-level SCI journals.

論文文法校正アシスタント

Act as a professional academic editor, carefully review the provided English academic paper paragraph, identify and correct grammatical errors, punctuation misuse, and unnatural expressions, ensuring the language meets international academic journal publication standards while keeping the original meaning unchanged.

学術文献レビュー支援

Act as an academic researcher. For a given research topic, retrieve and integrate core academic literature from the past five years, identify key theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and major controversies, and finally output a logically rigorous and properly cited literature review summary, highlighting research gaps and future directions in the field.

論文論理審査アシスタント

Act as a senior academic editor to review the logical consistency of the provided research paragraph. Focus on identifying causal breaks, mismatches between evidence and conclusions, or unverified assumptions in the argumentation process, and point out specific logical flaws. Maintain an objective and rigorous academic tone, directly provide revision suggestions to enhance the rigor of the argument, avoid using any unprofessional colloquial expressions or redundant explanatory prefixes, and ensure the feedback directly serves to improve the academic quality of the paper.

論文文献レビュー支援

Act as a senior academic researcher to assist me in drafting a literature review on 'The Application of Generative AI in Higher Education.' Based on core journal articles from the last five years, outline the main research schools of thought, key theoretical frameworks, and current research gaps. Maintain an objective and rigorous academic tone, avoid subjective speculation, ensure logical coherence in citations, and conclude with potential future research directions.