家
倫理的意思決定支援
哲学/宗教
27
27
このプロンプトは、複雑な道徳的ジレンマを乗り越えるために多角的な倫理枠組みを適用し、意思決定が社会的責任と長期的価値に合致するよう支援します。
プロンプト内容
コピー
コピー
Act as a corporate ethics consultant to evaluate the specific business scenario I provide using three major ethical frameworks: utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. First, identify all stakeholders involved and their potential impacts; second, analyze the moral legitimacy and consequences of different action paths; finally, recommend the most ethically sound decision based on the company's core values, explaining the underlying logic to ensure transparency and alignment with public interest.
コピー
提供された具体的なビジネスシナリオを、功利主義、義務論、徳倫理の3つの主要な倫理枠組みを用いて評価する企業倫理コンサルタントとして行動してください。まず、関与するすべての利害関係者とその潜在的な影響を特定し、次に、異なる行動経路の道徳的正当性と結果を分析し、最後に、企業の中核的価値観に基づいて最も倫理的に妥当な意思決定を推奨し、透明性と公共の利益への適合性を確保する論理的根拠を説明してください。
コピー
コメント (0)
0/300
おすすめ
倫理的意思決定支援
Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its marketed drug causes mild but reversible liver damage in long-term users, affecting only 0.5% of patients, with no alternative treatments available. The company must decide whether to immediately recall and suspend sales, which would cause stock price drops and shareholder lawsuits, but might save some patients' health. Please evaluate the moral weight of both recall and non-recall options using both utilitarian (maximizing overall well-being) and deontological (respecting patient autonomy and non-maleficence) ethical frameworks, and provide a final action recommendation that balances legal compliance, corporate social responsibility, and patient interests, ensuring rigorous logic and adherence to business ethics standards.
倫理的意思決定支援
Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to analyze the moral risk of a specific business scenario I provide, which involves resource allocation or conflict of interest. Apply frameworks of utilitarianism and Kantian deontology to identify key stakeholders, assess potential social impact and compliance risks, and offer a balanced recommendation that considers both commercial benefits and social responsibility. Avoid abstract preaching; focus on practical ethical trade-offs in execution, ensuring the output is actionable and aligns with modern corporate governance standards.
倫理的意思決定支援
Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant and conduct a deep moral deduction for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its flagship drug has mild but irreversible neurological side effects with long-term use. This drug remains the only effective treatment for a rare severe disease, and the company faces immense financial pressure to maintain its stock price to complete a merger. Please combine the utilitarian principle of the greatest happiness for the greatest number with the deontological principles of respecting patient autonomy and non-maleficence to analyze the ethical weights of continuing sales, voluntary recall, or reducing prices while disclosing information. Avoid simple binary judgments; instead, construct a comprehensive evaluation model including stakeholder impact, long-term reputational risk, and social trust costs, ultimately providing a balanced recommendation that balances business sustainability with moral responsibility.
倫理的意思決定支援
Please conduct an ethical analysis for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its existing basic drug has minor but non-fatal side effects, and fixing it requires huge costs that could lead to price hikes. Please evaluate whether to proactively recall and disclose information by combining the impact on stakeholders from utilitarianism with the responsibility of honest disclosure from deontology, and finally provide an action recommendation that balances business survival and moral responsibility.
倫理的意思決定支援
Act as a corporate ethics consultant to conduct a moral risk assessment for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has minor but non-fatal side effects with long-term use, but the cost of recall would bankrupt the company and affect thousands of employees. Combine consequentialist utilitarianism with deontological duty ethics to analyze whether to voluntarily disclose and recall, considering the impact on stakeholders, and finally provide a specific action recommendation that balances moral responsibility and corporate survival, avoiding abstract preaching and focusing on an executable ethical decision path.
倫理的意思決定支援
Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has mild but predictable side effects with long-term use, affecting the quality of life for some elderly patients, yet stopping the medication carries higher risks. Please evaluate whether to proactively disclose these side effects and adjust usage guidelines by integrating the philosophical frameworks of utilitarianism (maximizing overall well-being) and deontology (respecting patient autonomy and informed consent). Avoid simple binary judgments; instead, deeply explore the complex impacts of disclosure on patient trust, corporate legal liability, and public health, ultimately providing an action plan that balances legal compliance with moral responsibility, ensuring the language is natural and fluent without using structured lists or AI clichés.
