オプション
家 AIプロンプト一覧 学者/教師 大学学部コンピュータアルゴリズム期末試験作成

大学学部コンピュータアルゴリズム期末試験作成

{:__('collect %s',大学学部コンピュータアルゴリズム期末試験作成)}

大学学部のアルゴリズム設計と分析科目向けに、シラバスの要件に準拠し、核心知識を網羅し、難易度の配分が合理的な標準化期末筆記試験を自動生成します。

プロンプト内容 コピー コピー

Generate a standardized final closed-book exam paper that matches the syllabus requirements of the Algorithm Design and Analysis course for undergraduate computer science and technology majors in Chinese regular universities. The exam includes four question types: multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, short answer and comprehensive application, with weightings of 20%, 15%, 25% and 40% respectively, a total score of 100 and a test duration of 120 minutes. Questions must cover core knowledge points including divide and conquer, dynamic programming, greedy algorithm, backtracking and branch and bound, with an overall difficulty ratio of 5:3:2 for easy, medium and hard, and mark the tested knowledge point and estimated difficulty level for each question.

コピー コピー

国内の一般的な大学のコンピュータ科学・技術専攻の『アルゴリズム設計と分析』科目のシラバス要件に基づき、期末閉鎖型試験の要件に適合した標準試験問題を作成してください。試験の問題形式は選択問題、穴埋め問題、簡答問題、総合応用問題の4種類で、各問題形式の配点割合はそれぞれ20%、15%、25%、40%、総得点は100点、試験時間は120分に設定します。問題は分割統治法、動的計画法、貪欲法、バックトラッキング法、分枝限定法といった核心的な知識点を網羅し、全体の難易度は易・中・難の割合を5:3:2に配分し、各問題ごとに対応する出題知識点と予想難易度ランクを明記してください。

コピー コピー
コメント (1)
0/300
BrianBrown
BrianBrown 2026年9月28日 10:26:31 JST

这个期末考题生成器挺实用的,覆盖了分治、DP等核心考点,难度比例5:3:2也很合理。不过闭卷考试120分钟做40%的综合应用题感觉有点紧,建议增加一些提示。整体结构清晰,适合本科生复习使用,希望能支持自定义知识点权重就更好了!👍

おすすめ

論文推敲ツール
Please deeply rewrite the provided academic paper paragraph by replacing professional terminology with synonyms, adjusting active and passive voices, and restructuring complex sentence patterns. While strictly maintaining the original academic logic and data accuracy, significantly change the expression form to reduce plagiarism similarity, and finally output the complete rewritten paragraph.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. Identify core controversies, major theoretical schools, and recent advancements. Finally, output a structured literature review outline with standard citations, highlighting research gaps and potential innovation directions, ensuring academic rigor and logical coherence.
論文校正アシスタント
Please act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the English academic paragraph I provide. Focus on optimizing sentence fluency, the accuracy of academic terminology, and logical coherence, while correcting any grammatical or punctuation errors. Maintain the original academic rigor and core arguments, only enhancing the expression to meet the publication standards of top international journals.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as my academic research assistant and, regarding the topic 'Applications of Generative AI in Educational Assessment,' retrieve and synthesize key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify major theoretical frameworks, methodological debates, and recent empirical findings, summarizing the consensus and gaps of existing research in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid using lists or bullet points, ensure the language adheres to formal academic journal standards, and finally, suggest potential directions for future research.
論文校正アシスタント
Act as a senior academic editor to polish the provided English research paper draft. Focus on optimizing sentence structure for fluency and logical coherence, correcting grammatical errors and inappropriate word choices, ensuring terminology aligns with disciplinary standards, and adjusting the tone to meet formal academic publishing requirements while preserving the original meaning.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and key reference list, draft a detailed literature review. Identify major academic schools of thought, compare differences in scholars' viewpoints, highlight current research gaps or controversies, and summarize the latest development trends in the field. Ensure the language is rigorous, objective, and adheres to academic standards, avoiding subjective assumptions. Finally, provide a comprehensive concluding paragraph that offers direction for future research.
OR