企業倫理ジレンマAIアドバイザー

家

AIプロンプト一覧

哲学/宗教

倫理的意思決定支援

${:__('collect %s',倫理的意思決定支援)}$

哲学/宗教

事業運営における道徳的ジレンマに対し、功利主義と義務論に基づくバランスの取れた分析を提供し、価値観に合致した意思決定を支援します。

プロンプト内容

コピー

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to conduct a moral risk assessment for the specific business scenario I provide. This scenario involves a conflict between cost reduction and employee welfare guarantees. You need to combine utilitarian consequence analysis with deontological responsibility principles to evaluate the impact of different decision paths on stakeholders, and point out potential reputational risks and compliance hazards. Finally, please provide a structured ethical decision recommendation, clearly stating the recommended plan and its philosophical basis, ensuring the advice aligns with legal bottom lines while reflecting corporate social responsibility, maintaining an objective, professional tone without preaching.

コピー

シニア企業倫理コンサルタントとして、私が提供する具体的なビジネスシナリオの道徳的リスク評価を行ってください。このシナリオは、コスト削減と従業員福祉の保証との間の衝突を含みます。異なる意思決定経路が利害関係者に与える影響を評価し、潜在的な評判リスクとコンプライアンスの懸念を指摘するために、功利主義的な結果分析と義務論的な責任原則を組み合わせる必要があります。最後に、推奨される計画とその哲学的根拠を明確に示す構造化された倫理的意思決定の推奨事項を提供し、法的な底线に沿いつつ企業の社会的責任を反映したアドバイスとなるよう、説教を避け、客観的かつ専門的なトーンを維持してください。

コピー

共有リンクをコピーするにはクリック

コメント (0)

0/300

送信

おすすめ

倫理意思決定アシスタント

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze a conflict scenario involving data privacy and commercial interests. Apply utilitarian calculations to assess overall well-being and contrast this with deontological principles to examine the inherent righteousness of the action. Finally, output a decision plan that balances stakeholder interests, complies with laws and regulations, and reflects corporate social responsibility. Focus on explaining how to maintain business sustainability while protecting user privacy, avoiding simple binary oppositions, and providing actionable ethical guidelines.

倫理的意思決定支援

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has minor but under-disclosed side effects with long-term use. Recalling it causes massive financial loss and affects shareholder interests, while not recalling it may harm some patients' health. Please evaluate the ethical weights of both choices by combining the impact on overall well-being from a utilitarian perspective with the responsibility for honesty and patient safety from a deontological perspective, and provide a comprehensive recommendation that balances business sustainability with moral底线, focusing on how to rebuild public trust through transparent communication.

倫理的意思決定支援

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its marketed drug has minor but irreversible neurological side effects with long-term use, yet discontinuing it poses higher risks with no alternative therapies. Please evaluate whether the company should proactively recall and disclose this risk, integrating the utilitarian principle of maximizing happiness with the deontological principle of respecting autonomy. In your response, avoid stacking verbs like 'analyze', 'generate', or 'explain'; instead, provide a narrative that balances shareholder interests, patient safety, and public trust, offering an action plan that aligns with legal compliance and moral responsibility, while clearly articulating the ethical reasoning behind this recommendation.

倫理的意思決定支援

Please analyze the following specific ethical dilemma encountered in corporate operations: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its long-listed common drug may cause severe side effects in a very small subset of patients with specific genotypes, but the recall cost is extremely high and could lead to company bankruptcy, affecting the livelihoods of thousands of employees. Please evaluate the moral rationality of three strategies—recall, partial disclosure, or maintaining the status quo—by combining the impact on overall well-being from a utilitarian perspective with the responsibility for patient informed consent and safety from a deontological perspective, and provide a recommended solution that balances the interests of all parties and aligns with the company's long-term ethical responsibilities, ensuring the analysis is logically rigorous and avoids absolute conclusions.

倫理的意思決定支援

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its marketed drug has mild but predictable side effects with long-term use, yet the recall cost is extremely high and could lead to bankruptcy, resulting in the job loss of thousands of employees. Please evaluate whether the company should proactively disclose and recall the drug by combining utilitarian considerations of maximizing happiness for the greatest number with deontological principles of honesty and duty, and provide comprehensive advice balancing shareholder interests, patient safety, and social responsibility.

倫理的意思決定支援

When a company faces a moral dilemma involving conflicting stakeholders, please analyze the potential impact of different action paths on employees, customers, and the community by combining utilitarian consequence assessment with deontological principle review, and recommend a solution that is ethically most defensible and aligns with the company's long-term values, while explaining how this solution balances short-term interests with long-term reputation risks.