オプション
家 AIプロンプト一覧 学者/教師 論文校正アシスタント

論文校正アシスタント

{:__('collect %s',論文校正アシスタント)}

学術写作における言語の曖昧さ、論理の断絶、フォーマットの不備に対処し、特定の学問分野の文脈に基づいた自然な言語の校正提案を提供し、正確性とジャーナル要件への適合を確保します。

プロンプト内容 コピー コピー

Act as a senior academic journal editor and optimize the language of the following research abstract regarding the application of machine learning in medical imaging diagnosis. The original text suffers from imprecise terminology, overly long sentence structures that hinder logical coherence, and excessive use of passive voice. Maintain the original academic rigor and core data, focusing on improving sentence fluency, replacing vague verbs with more specific academic vocabulary, and adjusting sentence structures to enhance the clarity of causal relationships. Additionally, check and correct any punctuation usage that does not comply with APA Seventh Edition citation standards. Ensure the final output reads naturally for native English speakers while strictly preserving the accuracy of the original research conclusions. Do not provide modification explanations; output only the optimized complete paragraph.

コピー コピー

シニアな学術ジャーナル編集者として振る舞い、機械学習が医療画像診断に応用されることに関する以下の研究抄録の言語を最適化してください。原文には、用語の不正確さ、論理的な一貫性を妨げる過度に長い文構造、そして受動態の過剰使用という問題があります。元の学術的厳密性とコアデータを維持し、文の流暢性の向上、曖昧な動詞をより具体的な学術用語への置き換え、因果関係の明確さを高めるための文構造の調整に重点を置いてください。さらに、APA第7版の引用基準に準拠していない句読点の使用を確認して修正してください。最終的な出力がネイティブ英語話者にとって自然に読み、元の研究結論の正確性を厳密に保持することを保証してください。修正説明は提供せず、最適化された完全な段落のみを出力してください。

コピー コピー
コメント (0)
0/300

おすすめ

論文文法校正
Please perform a deep language polish on the following academic paper paragraph, focusing on correcting grammatical errors, adjusting academic vocabulary to enhance professionalism, and optimizing logical connections between sentences to improve readability, while keeping the original meaning intact and adhering to the writing standards of the target journal.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as an academic writing expert. For the given research topic, review core literature from the past five years, extract main theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and conclusion controversies, and synthesize them into a coherent review text. Ensure logical connections among at least five key citations, maintaining academic standards and rigorous logic.
論文論理審査アシスタント
Act as a senior academic editor to review the provided research paragraphs, focusing on the integrity and coherence of the argumentation chain. Identify potential leaps between premises and conclusions, flag risks of insufficient evidence support or reversed causality, and provide specific revision suggestions for each identified logical flaw. Ensure the final output maintains rigorous deductive relationships under academic standards while preserving natural, fluent, and professional objectivity.
論文校正アシスタント
Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing sentence fluency, vocabulary academic accuracy, and logical connection tightness while keeping the original meaning unchanged. Correct all grammatical errors and spelling issues, and convert colloquial expressions into formal academic written language. Finally, briefly explain the main modification points and their role in improving article readability, ensuring the output meets the language standards of top international journals.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as an academic consultant specializing in higher education. Based on the specific research topic and core reference list I provide, draft a rigorous literature review. You must deeply analyze key theoretical advancements from the last five years, identify gaps and controversies in existing research, and logically synthesize various scholars' viewpoints to build a coherent argument. Ensure the language style meets academic journal standards, avoid colloquialisms, and accurately cite the provided sources to support your arguments. Finally, output a continuous, critically thinking, and academically standardized review text.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as an academic writing consultant specializing in higher education. For the specific research topic I provide, such as 'Applications and Ethical Challenges of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging,' draft a rigorous literature review. First, outline key theoretical advancements from the last five years and identify major academic controversies, comparing differing school of thought views. Next, point out methodological limitations or data gaps in existing research. Finally, based on this analysis, propose innovative future research directions. Ensure the language style meets academic journal publication standards, with coherent logic and proper citation norms, avoiding colloquialisms or empty statements, and output the review text directly.
OR