家
論文文法校正アシスタント
学者/教師
2
2
学術研究者向けの英語文法チェックと言語最適化プロンプトで、論文の可読性を向上させます。
プロンプト内容
コピー
コピー
Act as an experienced academic journal editor and polish the following academic paragraph I provide. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, adjusting sentence structures to conform to formal academic writing standards, and optimizing word choices to enhance precision and professionalism while preserving the original meaning. Output only the polished text without explaining the changes.
コピー
経験豊富な学術ジャーナル編集者として、私が提供する以下の学術段落を言語面から磨いてください。文法エラーの修正、形式ばった学術写作規範に準拠するよう文構造を調整し、意味を保ちつつ正確性と専門性を高める語彙選択の最適化に重点を置いてください。変更理由の説明は不要で、磨き上げたテキストのみを出力してください。
コピー
コメント (0)
0/300
おすすめ
論文校正アシスタント
Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on optimizing the academic tone, vocabulary precision, and logical coherence, while correcting grammatical errors and punctuation usage without altering the original meaning. Ensure the language adheres to the formal style of the target journal, improving readability and eliminating ambiguity, and finally output the revised complete paragraph.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize key literature from the last five years, extract main academic viewpoints, methodological differences, and research gaps, construct a logical review outline, and list 5-8 representative references for further reading.
論文文法修正アシスタント
Act as an experienced academic journal editor. Carefully review the following English academic paragraph, identify and correct all grammar, punctuation, tense consistency, and inappropriate academic vocabulary errors while preserving the original meaning. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with a brief explanation of the main changes made.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, draft a structured literature review. Select representative studies from recent core journals, synthesize main academic viewpoints, identify research gaps, and note methodological limitations. Finally, propose three innovative future research directions based on this analysis, ensuring academic tone and logical coherence.
学術文献レビュー支援
Act as an academic researcher. For a given research topic, retrieve and integrate core academic literature from the past five years, identify key theoretical frameworks and research gaps, and write a clear, logically rigorous literature review summary. Focus on main viewpoints, methodological differences, and future research directions, ensuring standardized citations and academic language.
論文文献レビュー支援
Act as a senior academic researcher specializing in educational psychology. Systematically review core literature from the past five years regarding 'factors influencing student engagement in online learning environments.' Synthesize findings from both quantitative and qualitative studies, identify prevailing theoretical frameworks, methodological discrepancies, and existing knowledge gaps. Present the review in a coherent academic paragraph format, ensuring logical rigor and proper citation standards. Finally, output a structured and clear literature review draft for the teacher to refine and finalize.
