Générer l'examen final d'informatique fondamentale universitaire

Maison

Liste de prompts IA

Académique/Enseignant

Examen final d'informatique fondamentale

${:__('collect %s',Examen final d'informatique fondamentale)}$

Académique/Enseignant

Créer une épreuve finale conforme au programme avec types de questions, scores et corrigé

Contenu du prompt

Copier

Make a closed-book final exam for undergraduate general basic computer course that totals 100 points with a 120-minute time limit. Set 30 points for multiple choice, 15 for fill-in-the-blank, 25 for short answer and 30 for comprehensive operation questions, keep 60% basic questions, 25% medium and 15% advanced, add reference answer points for all questions.

Copier

Conformément au programme d'enseignement général d'informatique fondamentale pour étudiants de licence, préparez une épreuve finale à livre fermé d'un total de 100 points et d'une durée de 120 minutes. Attribuez 30 points aux questions à choix multiples, 15 points aux questions à trous, 25 points aux questions à réponse courte et 30 points aux exercices opérationnels complets, maintenez 60% de questions basiques, 25% de questions moyennes et 15% de questions difficiles, ajoutez les points de réponse de référence pour toutes les questions.

Copier

Partager Cliquez pour copier le lien

commentaires (0)

0/300

Soumettre

Recommandation

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic I provide, deeply analyze key academic literature from the past five years, identify major theoretical schools and research controversies, trace the evolution of research, and synthesize existing findings to point out current research gaps and future directions. Finally, output a logically rigorous, properly cited, and academically toned literature review draft to help me quickly construct the theoretical framework of my paper.

Correcteur Grammaire Papier

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, enhancing the academic precision of vocabulary, and optimizing sentence structures to improve logical coherence, while keeping the original meaning intact, ensuring the final text meets the publication standards of high-level SCI journals.

Assistant Revue Littérature

Act as an academic assistant specializing in education. Based on the specific subject theme and core reference list I provide, draft a rigorous literature review. You need to outline key research progress in this field over the past five years, identify major academic controversies, summarize the limitations of existing studies, and finally propose forward-looking future research directions, ensuring the language meets academic standards and the logic is coherent.

Correcteur Grammaire Papier

Act as a professional academic editor, carefully review the provided English academic paper paragraph, identify and correct grammatical errors, punctuation misuse, and unnatural expressions, ensuring the language meets international academic journal publication standards while keeping the original meaning unchanged.

Revue de Littérature Acad.

Act as an academic researcher. For a given research topic, retrieve and integrate core academic literature from the past five years, identify key theoretical frameworks, methodological differences, and major controversies, and finally output a logically rigorous and properly cited literature review summary, highlighting research gaps and future directions in the field.

Revue de logique de papier

Act as a senior academic editor to review the logical consistency of the provided research paragraph. Focus on identifying causal breaks, mismatches between evidence and conclusions, or unverified assumptions in the argumentation process, and point out specific logical flaws. Maintain an objective and rigorous academic tone, directly provide revision suggestions to enhance the rigor of the argument, avoid using any unprofessional colloquial expressions or redundant explanatory prefixes, and ensure the feedback directly serves to improve the academic quality of the paper.