Генератор контрольных по программе для технических вузов

Дом

Список AI-промптов

Академик/Преподаватель

Генератор контрольных для вуза

${:__('collect %s',Генератор контрольных для вуза)}$

Академик/Преподаватель

Генерирует контрольные работы по текущей программе для преподавателей технических вузов, с ответами и критериями оценивания

Содержание промпта

Копировать

Generate a 15-minute in-class pop quiz for the belt drive topic in the college course Fundamentals of Mechanical Design. The quiz matches current teaching progress and covers three core knowledge points: working principle, stress distribution and failure forms of belt drive. It includes 3 multiple-choice questions, 2 short-answer questions and 1 small analysis question with reasonable difficulty gradient, and finally attach complete reference answers and scoring criteria for each question

Копировать

Сгенерируйте 15-минутную аудиторную контрольную работу по теме ременной передачи для вузовского курса «Основы проектирования механизмов». Работа должна соответствовать текущему ходу обучения, охватывать три основных темы: принцип работы, распределение напряжений и виды отказов ременной передачи. Включите 3 вопроса с несколькими вариантами ответа, 2 коротких вопроса и 1 небольшой аналитический вопрос с равномерным распределением сложности, в конце добавьте полные ответы и критерии оценивания для каждого вопроса

Копировать

Поделиться Нажмите, чтобы скопировать ссылку

Комментарии (0)

0/300

Представлять на рассмотрение

Рекомендация

Редактор статей

Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on checking and correcting grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and punctuation usage, while optimizing sentence structures to improve the rigor and fluency of academic expression. Ensure accurate terminology usage and natural logical connections, adhering to the writing style guidelines of the target journal. Finally, list the main modifications and their reasons so I can understand the improvements.

Редактор статей

Act as a senior academic editor and deeply polish the provided English research abstract. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, replacing colloquial terms with formal academic vocabulary, and optimizing sentence structures to enhance logical flow while preserving the original meaning, ensuring the final text meets the language standards of international SCI journals.

Ассистент проверки логики статей

Act as a rigorous academic journal reviewer to carefully examine the provided academic paper excerpt, focusing on the logical coherence between core arguments and supporting evidence. You need to identify potential logical flaws such as reversed causality, sample bias, or overgeneralized conclusions in the argumentation process, and point out specific assertions in paragraphs that lack key data support. Additionally, evaluate whether literature citations accurately serve the current argument rather than merely acting as decorative stacking. Finally, provide revision suggestions in clear, objective academic language to help the author strengthen the rigor of the argumentation, ensuring the logical structure of the entire article is impeccable and meets high-level academic publication standards.

Редактор статей

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on identifying and correcting grammatical errors, inappropriate word choices, and monotonous sentence structures, ensuring the language meets the formal publication standards of international academic journals. Additionally, optimize the logical transitions between paragraphs to make the argumentation more rigorous and fluent, while preserving original technical terms and core viewpoints. Finally, briefly list the main modifications and their reasons to help the author understand the direction of improvement.

Рецензент логики статьи

Act as a senior academic editor to review the provided research paragraph, focusing on identifying logical leaps or causal reversals between arguments and evidence, and directly point out specific sentences needing correction and their reasons to enhance argument coherence and academic rigor, avoiding any template openings.

Помощник по проверке логики

Act as an academic consultant to carefully review the provided paper excerpt, focusing on evaluating the tightness of the logical connection between arguments and evidence, identifying any argumentative leaps or data interpretation biases, and offering specific revision suggestions for paragraph transitions to ensure the entire paper maintains high logical self-consistency and persuasiveness under academic standards.