옵션

api-design

affaan-m/ECC affaan-m/ECC

리소스 명명 규칙, HTTP 메서드, 상태 코드, 페이지 분할, 필터링, 오류 응답, 버전 관리 및 요청 제한에 대한 규약을 준수하여 일관성 있고 개발자 친화적인 REST API를 설계하십시오.

...모든 것을 확장하십시오
0
업데이트 된 시간 2026년 10월 1일

API 설계 패턴

일관성 있고 개발자 친화적인 REST API 설계를 위한 표준 및 모범 사례.

활성화 시점

  • 새로운 API 엔드포인트 설계 시
  • 기존 API 계약 검토 시
  • 페이징, 필터링 또는 정렬 기능 추가 시
  • API에 대한 오류 처리 구현
  • API 버전 관리 전략 수립
  • 공개용 또는 파트너용 API 구축

리소스 설계

URL 구조

# Resources are nouns, plural, lowercase, kebab-case
GET    /api/v1/users
GET    /api/v1/users/:id
POST   /api/v1/users
PUT    /api/v1/users/:id
PATCH  /api/v1/users/:id
DELETE /api/v1/users/:id

# Sub-resources for relationships
GET    /api/v1/users/:id/orders
POST   /api/v1/users/:id/orders

# Actions that don't map to CRUD (use verbs sparingly)
POST   /api/v1/orders/:id/cancel
POST   /api/v1/auth/login
POST   /api/v1/auth/refresh

명명 규칙

# GOOD
/api/v1/team-members          # kebab-case for multi-word resources
/api/v1/orders?status=active  # query params for filtering
/api/v1/users/123/orders      # nested resources for ownership

# BAD
/api/v1/getUsers              # verb in URL
/api/v1/user                  # singular (use plural)
/api/v1/team_members          # snake_case in URLs
/api/v1/users/123/getOrders   # verb in nested resource

HTTP 메서드 및 상태 코드

메서드 의미

메서드 이뎀포텐트 안전 사용 용도
GET 예 예 리소스 가져오기
POST 아니요 아니요 리소스 생성, 작업 트리거
PUT 예 아니요 리소스 전체 교체
PATCH 아니요* 아니요 리소스의 부분 업데이트
DELETE 예 아니요 리소스 제거

*적절한 구현을 통해 PATCH를 이뎀포텐트하게 만들 수 있습니다

상태 코드 참조

# Success
200 OK                    — GET, PUT, PATCH (with response body)
201 Created               — POST (include Location header)
204 No Content            — DELETE, PUT (no response body)

# Client Errors
400 Bad Request           — Validation failure, malformed JSON
401 Unauthorized          — Missing or invalid authentication
403 Forbidden             — Authenticated but not authorized
404 Not Found             — Resource doesn't exist
409 Conflict              — Duplicate entry, state conflict
422 Unprocessable Entity  — Semantically invalid (valid JSON, bad data)
429 Too Many Requests     — Rate limit exceeded

# Server Errors
500 Internal Server Error — Unexpected failure (never expose details)
502 Bad Gateway           — Upstream service failed
503 Service Unavailable   — Temporary overload, include Retry-After

흔히 저지르는 실수

# BAD: 200 for everything
{ "status": 200, "success": false, "error": "Not found" }

# GOOD: Use HTTP status codes semantically
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
{ "error": { "code": "not_found", "message": "User not found" } }

# BAD: 500 for validation errors
# GOOD: 400 or 422 with field-level details

# BAD: 200 for created resources
# GOOD: 201 with Location header
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Location: /api/v1/users/abc-123

응답 형식

성공 응답

{
  "data": {
    "id": "abc-123",
    "email": "[email protected]",
    "name": "Alice",
    "created_at": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z"
  }
}

컬렉션 응답 (페이지네이션 포함)

{
  "data": [
    { "id": "abc-123", "name": "Alice" },
    { "id": "def-456", "name": "Bob" }
  ],
  "meta": {
    "total": 142,
    "page": 1,
    "per_page": 20,
    "total_pages": 8
  },
  "links": {
    "self": "/api/v1/users?page=1&per_page=20",
    "next": "/api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20",
    "last": "/api/v1/users?page=8&per_page=20"
  }
}

오류 응답

{
  "error": {
    "code": "validation_error",
    "message": "Request validation failed",
    "details": [
      {
        "field": "email",
        "message": "Must be a valid email address",
        "code": "invalid_format"
      },
      {
        "field": "age",
        "message": "Must be between 0 and 150",
        "code": "out_of_range"
      }
    ]
  }
}

응답 엔벨로프 변형

// Option A: Envelope with data wrapper (recommended for public APIs)
interface ApiResponse {
  data: T;
  meta?: PaginationMeta;
  links?: PaginationLinks;
}

interface ApiError {
  error: {
    code: string;
    message: string;
    details?: FieldError[];
  };
}

// Option B: Flat response (simpler, common for internal APIs)
// Success: just return the resource directly
// Error: return error object
// Distinguish by HTTP status code

페이지 매김

오프셋 기반 (간단)

GET /api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20

# Implementation
SELECT * FROM users
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 20 OFFSET 20;

장점: 구현이 쉽고, "N 페이지로 이동" 기능을 지원함 단점: 오프셋이 클 경우(OFFSET 100000) 처리 속도가 느리며, 동시 삽입 작업과 호환되지 않음

커서 기반 (확장성 있음)

GET /api/v1/users?cursor=eyJpZCI6MTIzfQ&limit=20

# Implementation
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE id > :cursor_id
ORDER BY id ASC
LIMIT 21;  -- fetch one extra to determine has_next
{
  "data": [...],
  "meta": {
    "has_next": true,
    "next_cursor": "eyJpZCI6MTQzfQ"
  }
}

장점: 위치에 관계없이 일관된 성능을 제공하며, 동시 삽입 시에도 안정적 단점: 임의의 페이지로 바로 이동할 수 없으며, 커서의 내부 구조가 불투명

어떤 경우에 어떤 방식을 사용할지

사용 사례 페이지 나누기 유형
관리자 대시보드, 소규모 데이터 세트 (<10K) 오프셋
무한 스크롤, 피드, 대용량 데이터 세트 커서
공개 API 커서(기본값) 및 오프셋(선택 사항)
검색 결과 오프셋 (사용자는 페이지 번호를 기대함)

필터링, 정렬 및 검색

필터링

# Simple equality
GET /api/v1/orders?status=active&customer_id=abc-123

# Comparison operators (use bracket notation)
GET /api/v1/products?price[gte]=10&price[lte]=100
GET /api/v1/orders?created_at[after]=2025-01-01

# Multiple values (comma-separated)
GET /api/v1/products?category=electronics,clothing

# Nested fields (dot notation)
GET /api/v1/orders?customer.country=US

정렬

# Single field (prefix - for descending)
GET /api/v1/products?sort=-created_at

# Multiple fields (comma-separated)
GET /api/v1/products?sort=-featured,price,-created_at

전체 텍스트 검색

# Search query parameter
GET /api/v1/products?q=wireless+headphones

# Field-specific search
GET /api/v1/users?email=alice

스파스 필드셋

# Return only specified fields (reduces payload)
GET /api/v1/users?fields=id,name,email
GET /api/v1/orders?fields=id,total,status&include=customer.name

인증 및 권한 부여

토큰 기반 인증

# Bearer token in Authorization header
GET /api/v1/users
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs...

# API key (for server-to-server)
GET /api/v1/data
X-API-Key: sk_live_abc123

권한 부여 패턴

// Resource-level: check ownership
app.get("/api/v1/orders/:id", async (req, res) => {
  const order = await Order.findById(req.params.id);
  if (!order) return res.status(404).json({ error: { code: "not_found" } });
  if (order.userId !== req.user.id) return res.status(403).json({ error: { code: "forbidden" } });
  return res.json({ data: order });
});

// Role-based: check permissions
app.delete("/api/v1/users/:id", requireRole("admin"), async (req, res) => {
  await User.delete(req.params.id);
  return res.status(204).send();
});

속도 제한

헤더

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
X-RateLimit-Limit: 100
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 95
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1640000000

# When exceeded
HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Retry-After: 60
{
  "error": {
    "code": "rate_limit_exceeded",
    "message": "Rate limit exceeded. Try again in 60 seconds."
  }
}

속도 제한 단계

단계 제한 윈도우 사용 사례
익명 30/분 IP당 공개 엔드포인트
인증됨 100/분 사용자당 표준 API 액세스
프리미엄 1000/분 API 키당 유료 API 요금제
내부 10,000/분 서비스당 서비스 간

버전 관리

URL 경로 버전 관리 (권장)

/api/v1/users
/api/v2/users

장점: 명확하고, 라우팅이 쉬우며, 캐싱 가능 단점: 버전 간에 URL이 변경됨

헤더 버전 관리

GET /api/users
Accept: application/vnd.myapp.v2+json

장점: 깔끔한 URL 단점: 테스트하기 어렵고, 잊어버리기 쉬움

버전 관리 전략

1. Start with /api/v1/ — don't version until you need to
2. Maintain at most 2 active versions (current + previous)
3. Deprecation timeline:
   - Announce deprecation (6 months notice for public APIs)
   - Add Sunset header: Sunset: Sat, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT
   - Return 410 Gone after sunset date
4. Non-breaking changes don't need a new version:
   - Adding new fields to responses
   - Adding new optional query parameters
   - Adding new endpoints
5. Breaking changes require a new version:
   - Removing or renaming fields
   - Changing field types
   - Changing URL structure
   - Changing authentication method

구현 패턴

TypeScript (Next.js API 라우트)

import { z } from "zod";
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from "next/server";

const createUserSchema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
});

export async function POST(req: NextRequest) {
  const body = await req.json();
  const parsed = createUserSchema.safeParse(body);

  if (!parsed.success) {
    return NextResponse.json({
      error: {
        code: "validation_error",
        message: "Request validation failed",
        details: parsed.error.issues.map(i => ({
          field: i.path.join("."),
          message: i.message,
          code: i.code,
        })),
      },
    }, { status: 422 });
  }

  const user = await createUser(parsed.data);

  return NextResponse.json(
    { data: user },
    {
      status: 201,
      headers: { Location: `/api/v1/users/${user.id}` },
    },
  );
}

Python (Django REST Framework)

from rest_framework import serializers, viewsets, status
from rest_framework.response import Response

class CreateUserSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
    email = serializers.EmailField()
    name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)

class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
    class Meta:
        model = User
        fields = ["id", "email", "name", "created_at"]

class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
    serializer_class = UserSerializer
    permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]

    def get_serializer_class(self):
        if self.action == "create":
            return CreateUserSerializer
        return UserSerializer

    def create(self, request):
        serializer = CreateUserSerializer(data=request.data)
        serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
        user = UserService.create(**serializer.validated_data)
        return Response(
            {"data": UserSerializer(user).data},
            status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED,
            headers={"Location": f"/api/v1/users/{user.id}"},
        )

Go (net/http)

func (h *UserHandler) CreateUser(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    var req CreateUserRequest
    if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&req); err != nil {
        writeError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, "invalid_json", "Invalid request body")
        return
    }

    if err := req.Validate(); err != nil {
        writeError(w, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, "validation_error", err.Error())
        return
    }

    user, err := h.service.Create(r.Context(), req)
    if err != nil {
        switch {
        case errors.Is(err, domain.ErrEmailTaken):
            writeError(w, http.StatusConflict, "email_taken", "Email already registered")
        default:
            writeError(w, http.StatusInternalServerError, "internal_error", "Internal error")
        }
        return
    }

    w.Header().Set("Location", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/users/%s", user.ID))
    writeJSON(w, http.StatusCreated, map[string]any{"data": user})
}

API 설계 체크리스트

새로운 엔드포인트를 배포하기 전에:

  • 리소스 URL이 명명 규칙을 따르는지 확인 (복수형, 케밥 케이스, 동사 미사용)
  • 올바른 HTTP 메서드가 사용되었는지 확인 (읽기 시 GET, 생성 시 POST 등)
  • 적절한 상태 코드가 반환되어야 합니다(모든 요청에 200을 반환해서는 안 됨)
  • 스키마(Zod, Pydantic, Bean Validation)를 사용하여 입력 값 유효성 검사
  • 오류 응답은 코드와 메시지가 포함된 표준 형식을 따릅니다
  • 목록 엔드포인트에 페이지네이션 구현됨(커서 또는 오프셋)
  • 인증 필요 (또는 명시적으로 공개로 표시됨)
  • 권한 확인 (사용자는 자신의 리소스에만 접근 가능)
  • 속도 제한이 구성되어 있음
  • 응답에 내부 세부 정보(스택 트레이스, SQL 오류)가 유출되지 않습니다
  • 기존 엔드포인트와 일관된 명명 규칙 적용 (camelCase 대 snake_case)
  • 문서화됨 (OpenAPI/Swagger 사양 업데이트됨)
GitHub에서 보기
---
name: api-design
description: Design consistent, developer-friendly REST APIs with conventions for resource naming, HTTP methods, status codes, pagination, filtering, error responses, versioning, and rate limiting.
---

# API Design Patterns

Conventions and best practices for designing consistent, developer-friendly REST APIs.

## When to Activate

- Designing new API endpoints
- Reviewing existing API contracts
- Adding pagination, filtering, or sorting
- Implementing error handling for APIs
- Planning API versioning strategy
- Building public or partner-facing APIs

## Resource Design

### URL Structure

```
# Resources are nouns, plural, lowercase, kebab-case
GET    /api/v1/users
GET    /api/v1/users/:id
POST   /api/v1/users
PUT    /api/v1/users/:id
PATCH  /api/v1/users/:id
DELETE /api/v1/users/:id

# Sub-resources for relationships
GET    /api/v1/users/:id/orders
POST   /api/v1/users/:id/orders

# Actions that don't map to CRUD (use verbs sparingly)
POST   /api/v1/orders/:id/cancel
POST   /api/v1/auth/login
POST   /api/v1/auth/refresh
```

### Naming Rules

```
# GOOD
/api/v1/team-members          # kebab-case for multi-word resources
/api/v1/orders?status=active  # query params for filtering
/api/v1/users/123/orders      # nested resources for ownership

# BAD
/api/v1/getUsers              # verb in URL
/api/v1/user                  # singular (use plural)
/api/v1/team_members          # snake_case in URLs
/api/v1/users/123/getOrders   # verb in nested resource
```

## HTTP Methods and Status Codes

### Method Semantics

| Method | Idempotent | Safe | Use For |
|--------|-----------|------|---------|
| GET | Yes | Yes | Retrieve resources |
| POST | No | No | Create resources, trigger actions |
| PUT | Yes | No | Full replacement of a resource |
| PATCH | No* | No | Partial update of a resource |
| DELETE | Yes | No | Remove a resource |

*PATCH can be made idempotent with proper implementation

### Status Code Reference

```
# Success
200 OK                    — GET, PUT, PATCH (with response body)
201 Created               — POST (include Location header)
204 No Content            — DELETE, PUT (no response body)

# Client Errors
400 Bad Request           — Validation failure, malformed JSON
401 Unauthorized          — Missing or invalid authentication
403 Forbidden             — Authenticated but not authorized
404 Not Found             — Resource doesn't exist
409 Conflict              — Duplicate entry, state conflict
422 Unprocessable Entity  — Semantically invalid (valid JSON, bad data)
429 Too Many Requests     — Rate limit exceeded

# Server Errors
500 Internal Server Error — Unexpected failure (never expose details)
502 Bad Gateway           — Upstream service failed
503 Service Unavailable   — Temporary overload, include Retry-After
```

### Common Mistakes

```
# BAD: 200 for everything
{ "status": 200, "success": false, "error": "Not found" }

# GOOD: Use HTTP status codes semantically
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
{ "error": { "code": "not_found", "message": "User not found" } }

# BAD: 500 for validation errors
# GOOD: 400 or 422 with field-level details

# BAD: 200 for created resources
# GOOD: 201 with Location header
HTTP/1.1 201 Created
Location: /api/v1/users/abc-123
```

## Response Format

### Success Response

```json
{
  "data": {
    "id": "abc-123",
    "email": "[email protected]",
    "name": "Alice",
    "created_at": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z"
  }
}
```

### Collection Response (with Pagination)

```json
{
  "data": [
    { "id": "abc-123", "name": "Alice" },
    { "id": "def-456", "name": "Bob" }
  ],
  "meta": {
    "total": 142,
    "page": 1,
    "per_page": 20,
    "total_pages": 8
  },
  "links": {
    "self": "/api/v1/users?page=1&per_page=20",
    "next": "/api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20",
    "last": "/api/v1/users?page=8&per_page=20"
  }
}
```

### Error Response

```json
{
  "error": {
    "code": "validation_error",
    "message": "Request validation failed",
    "details": [
      {
        "field": "email",
        "message": "Must be a valid email address",
        "code": "invalid_format"
      },
      {
        "field": "age",
        "message": "Must be between 0 and 150",
        "code": "out_of_range"
      }
    ]
  }
}
```

### Response Envelope Variants

```typescript
// Option A: Envelope with data wrapper (recommended for public APIs)
interface ApiResponse<T> {
  data: T;
  meta?: PaginationMeta;
  links?: PaginationLinks;
}

interface ApiError {
  error: {
    code: string;
    message: string;
    details?: FieldError[];
  };
}

// Option B: Flat response (simpler, common for internal APIs)
// Success: just return the resource directly
// Error: return error object
// Distinguish by HTTP status code
```

## Pagination

### Offset-Based (Simple)

```
GET /api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20

# Implementation
SELECT * FROM users
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 20 OFFSET 20;
```

**Pros:** Easy to implement, supports "jump to page N"
**Cons:** Slow on large offsets (OFFSET 100000), inconsistent with concurrent inserts

### Cursor-Based (Scalable)

```
GET /api/v1/users?cursor=eyJpZCI6MTIzfQ&limit=20

# Implementation
SELECT * FROM users
WHERE id > :cursor_id
ORDER BY id ASC
LIMIT 21;  -- fetch one extra to determine has_next
```

```json
{
  "data": [...],
  "meta": {
    "has_next": true,
    "next_cursor": "eyJpZCI6MTQzfQ"
  }
}
```

**Pros:** Consistent performance regardless of position, stable with concurrent inserts
**Cons:** Cannot jump to arbitrary page, cursor is opaque

### When to Use Which

| Use Case | Pagination Type |
|----------|----------------|
| Admin dashboards, small datasets (<10K) | Offset |
| Infinite scroll, feeds, large datasets | Cursor |
| Public APIs | Cursor (default) with offset (optional) |
| Search results | Offset (users expect page numbers) |

## Filtering, Sorting, and Search

### Filtering

```
# Simple equality
GET /api/v1/orders?status=active&customer_id=abc-123

# Comparison operators (use bracket notation)
GET /api/v1/products?price[gte]=10&price[lte]=100
GET /api/v1/orders?created_at[after]=2025-01-01

# Multiple values (comma-separated)
GET /api/v1/products?category=electronics,clothing

# Nested fields (dot notation)
GET /api/v1/orders?customer.country=US
```

### Sorting

```
# Single field (prefix - for descending)
GET /api/v1/products?sort=-created_at

# Multiple fields (comma-separated)
GET /api/v1/products?sort=-featured,price,-created_at
```

### Full-Text Search

```
# Search query parameter
GET /api/v1/products?q=wireless+headphones

# Field-specific search
GET /api/v1/users?email=alice
```

### Sparse Fieldsets

```
# Return only specified fields (reduces payload)
GET /api/v1/users?fields=id,name,email
GET /api/v1/orders?fields=id,total,status&include=customer.name
```

## Authentication and Authorization

### Token-Based Auth

```
# Bearer token in Authorization header
GET /api/v1/users
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs...

# API key (for server-to-server)
GET /api/v1/data
X-API-Key: sk_live_abc123
```

### Authorization Patterns

```typescript
// Resource-level: check ownership
app.get("/api/v1/orders/:id", async (req, res) => {
  const order = await Order.findById(req.params.id);
  if (!order) return res.status(404).json({ error: { code: "not_found" } });
  if (order.userId !== req.user.id) return res.status(403).json({ error: { code: "forbidden" } });
  return res.json({ data: order });
});

// Role-based: check permissions
app.delete("/api/v1/users/:id", requireRole("admin"), async (req, res) => {
  await User.delete(req.params.id);
  return res.status(204).send();
});
```

## Rate Limiting

### Headers

```
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
X-RateLimit-Limit: 100
X-RateLimit-Remaining: 95
X-RateLimit-Reset: 1640000000

# When exceeded
HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Retry-After: 60
{
  "error": {
    "code": "rate_limit_exceeded",
    "message": "Rate limit exceeded. Try again in 60 seconds."
  }
}
```

### Rate Limit Tiers

| Tier | Limit | Window | Use Case |
|------|-------|--------|----------|
| Anonymous | 30/min | Per IP | Public endpoints |
| Authenticated | 100/min | Per user | Standard API access |
| Premium | 1000/min | Per API key | Paid API plans |
| Internal | 10000/min | Per service | Service-to-service |

## Versioning

### URL Path Versioning (Recommended)

```
/api/v1/users
/api/v2/users
```

**Pros:** Explicit, easy to route, cacheable
**Cons:** URL changes between versions

### Header Versioning

```
GET /api/users
Accept: application/vnd.myapp.v2+json
```

**Pros:** Clean URLs
**Cons:** Harder to test, easy to forget

### Versioning Strategy

```
1. Start with /api/v1/ — don't version until you need to
2. Maintain at most 2 active versions (current + previous)
3. Deprecation timeline:
   - Announce deprecation (6 months notice for public APIs)
   - Add Sunset header: Sunset: Sat, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT
   - Return 410 Gone after sunset date
4. Non-breaking changes don't need a new version:
   - Adding new fields to responses
   - Adding new optional query parameters
   - Adding new endpoints
5. Breaking changes require a new version:
   - Removing or renaming fields
   - Changing field types
   - Changing URL structure
   - Changing authentication method
```

## Implementation Patterns

### TypeScript (Next.js API Route)

```typescript
import { z } from "zod";
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from "next/server";

const createUserSchema = z.object({
  email: z.string().email(),
  name: z.string().min(1).max(100),
});

export async function POST(req: NextRequest) {
  const body = await req.json();
  const parsed = createUserSchema.safeParse(body);

  if (!parsed.success) {
    return NextResponse.json({
      error: {
        code: "validation_error",
        message: "Request validation failed",
        details: parsed.error.issues.map(i => ({
          field: i.path.join("."),
          message: i.message,
          code: i.code,
        })),
      },
    }, { status: 422 });
  }

  const user = await createUser(parsed.data);

  return NextResponse.json(
    { data: user },
    {
      status: 201,
      headers: { Location: `/api/v1/users/${user.id}` },
    },
  );
}
```

### Python (Django REST Framework)

```python
from rest_framework import serializers, viewsets, status
from rest_framework.response import Response

class CreateUserSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
    email = serializers.EmailField()
    name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)

class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
    class Meta:
        model = User
        fields = ["id", "email", "name", "created_at"]

class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
    serializer_class = UserSerializer
    permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]

    def get_serializer_class(self):
        if self.action == "create":
            return CreateUserSerializer
        return UserSerializer

    def create(self, request):
        serializer = CreateUserSerializer(data=request.data)
        serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
        user = UserService.create(**serializer.validated_data)
        return Response(
            {"data": UserSerializer(user).data},
            status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED,
            headers={"Location": f"/api/v1/users/{user.id}"},
        )
```

### Go (net/http)

```go
func (h *UserHandler) CreateUser(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    var req CreateUserRequest
    if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&req); err != nil {
        writeError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, "invalid_json", "Invalid request body")
        return
    }

    if err := req.Validate(); err != nil {
        writeError(w, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, "validation_error", err.Error())
        return
    }

    user, err := h.service.Create(r.Context(), req)
    if err != nil {
        switch {
        case errors.Is(err, domain.ErrEmailTaken):
            writeError(w, http.StatusConflict, "email_taken", "Email already registered")
        default:
            writeError(w, http.StatusInternalServerError, "internal_error", "Internal error")
        }
        return
    }

    w.Header().Set("Location", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/users/%s", user.ID))
    writeJSON(w, http.StatusCreated, map[string]any{"data": user})
}
```

## API Design Checklist

Before shipping a new endpoint:

- [ ] Resource URL follows naming conventions (plural, kebab-case, no verbs)
- [ ] Correct HTTP method used (GET for reads, POST for creates, etc.)
- [ ] Appropriate status codes returned (not 200 for everything)
- [ ] Input validated with schema (Zod, Pydantic, Bean Validation)
- [ ] Error responses follow standard format with codes and messages
- [ ] Pagination implemented for list endpoints (cursor or offset)
- [ ] Authentication required (or explicitly marked as public)
- [ ] Authorization checked (user can only access their own resources)
- [ ] Rate limiting configured
- [ ] Response does not leak internal details (stack traces, SQL errors)
- [ ] Consistent naming with existing endpoints (camelCase vs snake_case)
- [ ] Documented (OpenAPI/Swagger spec updated)

모든 파일

1개 파일

api-design 설치

스킬 파일을 다운로드하여 .claude/skills/ 디렉터리에 압축을 풀어주세요.

ZIP 다운로드

저장소를 클론하고 스킬 파일을 프로젝트에 복사하세요.

git clone https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC/tree/main/skills/api-design # Copy SKILL.md to your .claude/skills/ directory

복사 복사
빠른 설정: 스킬 폴더를 .claude/skills/로 복사하세요. Claude가 해당 스킬을 자동으로 감지하여 사용할 것입니다.
저장소 affaan-m/ECC

관련 스킬

algorithmic-art
업데이트 된 시간 2026년 8월 27일
systematic-debugging
업데이트 된 시간 2026년 9월 3일
tech-debt-tracker
업데이트 된 시간 2026년 8월 29일
continual-learning
업데이트 된 시간 2026년 9월 10일
OR