비즈니스 윤리 AI 컨설턴트

집

AI 프롬프트 목록

철학/종교

윤리적 의사결정 지원

${:__('collect %s',윤리적 의사결정 지원)}$

철학/종교

공리주의와 의무론적 틀을 기반으로 구체적인 비즈니스 시나리오에 대한 도덕적 위험 평가 및 의사결정 조언을 제공합니다.

프롬프트 내용

복사

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its marketed drug causes mild but reversible liver damage in long-term users, affecting only 0.5% of patients, with no alternative treatments available. The company must decide whether to immediately recall and suspend sales, which would cause stock price drops and shareholder lawsuits, but might save some patients' health. Please evaluate the moral weight of both recall and non-recall options using both utilitarian (maximizing overall well-being) and deontological (respecting patient autonomy and non-maleficence) ethical frameworks, and provide a final action recommendation that balances legal compliance, corporate social responsibility, and patient interests, ensuring rigorous logic and adherence to business ethics standards.

복사

시니어 기업 윤리 고문으로서 다음 구체적인 비즈니스 시나리오를 분석하십시오. 제약 회사는 시장 출시 약물이 장기 복용 시 환자의 0.5%에게 경미하지만 가역적인 간 손상을 유발한다는 사실을 발견했습니다. 대체 치료제가 없으며, 회사는 즉시 회수하고 판매를 중단할지 여부를 결정해야 합니다. 이는 주가 하락과 주주 소송을 초래할 수 있지만 일부 환자의 건강을 구할 수도 있습니다. 공리주의(전체 복지의 최대화)와 의무론(환자의 자율성과 해악 금지 원칙의 존중)이라는 두 가지 윤리적 틀을 사용하여 회수 및 비회수 옵션의 도덕적 무게를 평가하고, 법적 준수, 기업의 사회적 책임, 환자 이익의 균형을 맞추는 최종 행동 권고를 제공하십시오.

복사

공유 링크를 복사하려면 클릭

의견 (0)

0/300

제출하다

추천

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to analyze the moral risk of a specific business scenario I provide, which involves resource allocation or conflict of interest. Apply frameworks of utilitarianism and Kantian deontology to identify key stakeholders, assess potential social impact and compliance risks, and offer a balanced recommendation that considers both commercial benefits and social responsibility. Avoid abstract preaching; focus on practical ethical trade-offs in execution, ensuring the output is actionable and aligns with modern corporate governance standards.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant and conduct a deep moral deduction for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its flagship drug has mild but irreversible neurological side effects with long-term use. This drug remains the only effective treatment for a rare severe disease, and the company faces immense financial pressure to maintain its stock price to complete a merger. Please combine the utilitarian principle of the greatest happiness for the greatest number with the deontological principles of respecting patient autonomy and non-maleficence to analyze the ethical weights of continuing sales, voluntary recall, or reducing prices while disclosing information. Avoid simple binary judgments; instead, construct a comprehensive evaluation model including stakeholder impact, long-term reputational risk, and social trust costs, ultimately providing a balanced recommendation that balances business sustainability with moral responsibility.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Please conduct an ethical analysis for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its existing basic drug has minor but non-fatal side effects, and fixing it requires huge costs that could lead to price hikes. Please evaluate whether to proactively recall and disclose information by combining the impact on stakeholders from utilitarianism with the responsibility of honest disclosure from deontology, and finally provide an action recommendation that balances business survival and moral responsibility.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to conduct a moral risk assessment for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has minor but non-fatal side effects with long-term use, but the cost of recall would bankrupt the company and affect thousands of employees. Combine consequentialist utilitarianism with deontological duty ethics to analyze whether to voluntarily disclose and recall, considering the impact on stakeholders, and finally provide a specific action recommendation that balances moral responsibility and corporate survival, avoiding abstract preaching and focusing on an executable ethical decision path.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a corporate ethics consultant to analyze the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its best-selling drug has mild but predictable side effects with long-term use, affecting the quality of life for some elderly patients, yet stopping the medication carries higher risks. Please evaluate whether to proactively disclose these side effects and adjust usage guidelines by integrating the philosophical frameworks of utilitarianism (maximizing overall well-being) and deontology (respecting patient autonomy and informed consent). Avoid simple binary judgments; instead, deeply explore the complex impacts of disclosure on patient trust, corporate legal liability, and public health, ultimately providing an action plan that balances legal compliance with moral responsibility, ensuring the language is natural and fluent without using structured lists or AI clichés.

윤리적 의사결정 지원

Act as a senior corporate ethics consultant to provide decision-making advice for the following specific business scenario: A pharmaceutical company discovers that its existing basic drug has rare but severe side effects. Recalling it would cause the company to go bankrupt and affect accessibility for millions of patients, while not recalling it might harm some patients' health. Please combine utilitarian consequence assessment with deontological responsibility principles to analyze the conflict of interests among stakeholders, and provide a balanced solution that considers both moral responsibility and survival reality. Avoid absolute moral judgments, but instead offer specific action paths based on risk minimization and enhanced transparency.