대학 이공계 주관식 평소 과제 자동 채점 기준 생성

집

AI 프롬프트 목록

학자/교사

대학 이공계 과목 평소 과제 자동 채점

${:__('collect %s',대학 이공계 과목 평소 과제 자동 채점)}$

학자/교사

대학 이공계 과목의 주관식 평소 과제에 대해 강의 계획과 지식 평가 요구에 따라 공정하고 실행 가능한 채점 기준과 답안 참고를 자동 생성해 강사의 대량 과제 채점을 돕습니다.

프롬프트 내용

복사

Based on the provided undergraduate STEM course syllabus, knowledge assessment goals and homework requirements of the corresponding assignment, you need to organize a clear and actionable grading rubric for subjective regular homework, mark the judgment standards for different score ranges, and sort out core answer points as grading references to help course instructors complete batch homework grading quickly and keep the grading fair and consistent.

복사

제공된 대학 이공계 강의 계획, 해당 과제의 지식 평가 목표 및 과제 요구사항을 바탕으로 명확하고 실행 가능한 주관식 평소 과제의 채점 기준을 정리하고, 각 점수 구간별 평가 기준을 표기하며, 핵심 답안 포인트를 채점 참고로 정리하여 강사가 빠르게 대량 과제 채점을 완료하고 채점의 공정성과 일관성을 유지할 수 있도록 해주세요.

복사

공유 링크를 복사하려면 클릭

의견 (1)

0/300

제출하다

CarlCarter

2026년 9월 15일 오전 6시 26분 34초 GMT+09:00

这个自动评分提示词挺实用的，特别是针对STEM课程的作业。它要求根据教学大纲和评估目标生成评分标准，这能帮老师快速批改主观题，保证公平性。不过，如果作业题目太灵活，可能还是得人工复核。整体结构清晰，值得试试！👍

추천

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, deeply analyze key academic literature from the past five years, identify major theoretical schools and research controversies, trace the research lineage, and write a literature review draft including an introduction, main analysis, and conclusion, ensuring standardized citations and coherent logic.

문헌 리뷰 보조 도구

Please act as a senior academic researcher. For the specific research topic provided by the user, retrieve and integrate key academic literature from the past five years. You need to identify the main theoretical frameworks, points of contention, and latest research trends in this field, and write a preliminary literature review in coherent paragraphs. The content should include a comparative analysis of core viewpoints, point out current research gaps, and suggest possible directions for future research, ensuring the language is rigorous, objective, and conforms to academic standards, avoiding informal expressions or subjective speculation.

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher. For the provided research topic, synthesize core literature from the last five years, identify key academic debates, summarize current research limitations, and propose three innovative future research directions with rigorous logic and standard citations.

문헌 검토 보조 도구

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific subject matter and key reference list I provide, write an in-depth literature review. First, map the research trajectory and identify core controversies and theoretical evolutions. Then, synthesize major viewpoints from various scholars, highlighting current research gaps and limitations. Finally, propose forward-looking future research directions. Ensure the language is rigorous and logical, strictly adhering to academic citation norms without subjective speculation, aiming to provide a solid theoretical and empirical foundation for my subsequent research.

문헌 리뷰 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher and write a detailed literature review for the provided research topic. First, outline core findings from the last five years, identifying major schools of thought and points of contention, while summarizing key theoretical models. Next, critically evaluate the limitations of existing research, pointing out methodological flaws or data gaps. Finally, based on this analysis, propose potential future research directions and theoretical breakthroughs, ensuring rigorous logic and standardized citations to support subsequent empirical studies.

문헌 검토 어시스턴트

Act as a senior academic researcher and systematically review key scholarly literature from the past five years regarding my provided research topic. You need to identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent research trends, summarizing existing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph format. Avoid lists or bullet points, ensuring the language adheres to academic standards and logical rigor, ultimately forming a complete literature review background description.