Generar examen final de informática básica universitaria

Hogar

Lista de Prompts de IA

Académico/Profesor

Generación examen final informática básica universidad

${:__('collect %s',Generación examen final informática básica universidad)}$

Académico/Profesor

Cree un examen final cerrado de informática básica universitaria acorde al programa, con tipos de preguntas, puntuaciones y soluciones.

Contenido del prompt

Copiar

Based on the given college computer fundamentals course syllabus, create a 100-point closed-book final exam with 60% basic questions, 30% medium questions and 10% advanced questions. Include multiple choice, multiple select, true-false and operation short-answer questions, mark the知识点 and score for each question, then add a full answer key at the end.

Copiar

Según el programa dado del curso de informática básica universitaria, cree un examen final cerrado de 100 puntos con 60% de preguntas básicas, 30% de preguntas medianas y 10% de preguntas avanzadas. Incluya opción única, opción múltiple, verdadero/falso y preguntas cortas de operación, marque el punto de conocimiento y la puntuación de cada pregunta, luego agregue una clave de respuestas completa al final.

Copiar

Compartir Haga clic para copiar el enlace

comentario (0)

0/300

Enviar

Recomendación

Asistente Revisión Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the provided research topic and core reference list, write a rigorous literature review. First, outline the development trajectory of the field, identifying key theoretical divergences and research gaps. Then, synthesize the core arguments of various papers, pointing out current limitations, and finally propose innovative future research directions. Ensure academic language, logical rigor, and accurate citation of provided sources, avoiding subjective assumptions while maintaining an objective tone. Output a complete review text suitable for a thesis introduction or discussion section.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

Corrector de tesis

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.

Corrector de Artículos

Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on checking and correcting grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and punctuation usage, while optimizing sentence structures to improve the rigor and fluency of academic expression. Ensure accurate terminology usage and natural logical connections, adhering to the writing style guidelines of the target journal. Finally, list the main modifications and their reasons so I can understand the improvements.