Herramienta de Revisión para Docentes

Hogar

Lista de Prompts de IA

Académico/Profesor

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

${:__('collect %s',Asistente de Revisión de Literatura)}$

Académico/Profesor

Un prompt de asistencia académica para profesores universitarios, diseñado para generar rápidamente marcos de revisión de literatura y resúmenes centrales para áreas específicas, mejorando la eficiencia de la investigación.

Contenido del prompt

Copiar

Act as a senior academic researcher. Based on the specific research topic and keywords I provide,梳理 key academic literature from the past five years. Identify major theoretical schools, points of contention, and recent trends. Summarize 3-5 core research questions in a coherent natural paragraph, avoiding lists or structured templates. Ensure the language is fluent and academically appropriate, and conclude with a brief analysis of research gaps.

Copiar

Actúe como un investigador académico senior. Basándose en el tema de investigación específico y las palabras clave que proporciono, organice las principales literaturas académicas de los últimos cinco años. Identifique las escuelas teóricas principales, puntos de controversia y tendencias recientes. Resuma 3-5 preguntas de investigación centrales en forma de párrafos naturales coherentes, evitando listas o plantillas estructuradas. Asegúrese de que el lenguaje sea fluido y conforme a las normas académicas, y concluya con un análisis breve de las lagunas de investigación.

Copiar

Compartir Haga clic para copiar el enlace

comentario (0)

0/300

Enviar

Recomendación

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as my academic research assistant. For the specific research topic I provide, summarize key academic literature from the past five years, categorize major theoretical schools and points of contention, identify current research gaps, and present the review in a coherent paragraph with rigorous logic and proper citation style.

Asistente de Revisión de Literatura

Act as a senior academic researcher to systematically review key literature in the provided research topic over the last five years. Identify major theoretical schools, core controversies, and recent trends, summarizing contributions and gaps in a coherent paragraph without using lists or structured templates, ensuring natural academic language, and finally pointing out potential future research voids.

Corrector de tesis

Act as a senior academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paragraph. Focus on optimizing the logical coherence of sentence structures, correcting grammatical errors, and replacing colloquial expressions with more rigorous academic vocabulary, while ensuring compliance with APA citation format standards. Finally, output the revised complete paragraph along with explanations of the main modifications.

Corrector de Artículos

Act as an experienced academic journal editor and deeply polish the provided English academic paper excerpt. Focus on checking and correcting grammatical errors, spelling mistakes, and punctuation usage, while optimizing sentence structures to improve the rigor and fluency of academic expression. Ensure accurate terminology usage and natural logical connections, adhering to the writing style guidelines of the target journal. Finally, list the main modifications and their reasons so I can understand the improvements.

Corrector de Papeles

Act as a senior academic editor and deeply polish the provided English research abstract. Focus on correcting grammatical errors, replacing colloquial terms with formal academic vocabulary, and optimizing sentence structures to enhance logical flow while preserving the original meaning, ensuring the final text meets the language standards of international SCI journals.

Asistente de revisión lógica de artículos

Act as a rigorous academic journal reviewer to carefully examine the provided academic paper excerpt, focusing on the logical coherence between core arguments and supporting evidence. You need to identify potential logical flaws such as reversed causality, sample bias, or overgeneralized conclusions in the argumentation process, and point out specific assertions in paragraphs that lack key data support. Additionally, evaluate whether literature citations accurately serve the current argument rather than merely acting as decorative stacking. Finally, provide revision suggestions in clear, objective academic language to help the author strengthen the rigor of the argumentation, ensuring the logical structure of the entire article is impeccable and meets high-level academic publication standards.